Check nearby libraries
Buy this book
Lisbeth S. Fried’s insightful study investigates the impact of Achaemenid rule on the political power of local priesthoods during the 6th–4th centuries B.C.E. Scholars typically assume that, as long as tribute was sent to Susa, the capital of the Achaemenid Empire, subject peoples remained autonomous. Fried’s work challenges this assumption. She examines the inscriptions, coins, temple archives, and literary texts from Babylon, Egypt, Asia Minor, and Judah and concludes that there was no local autonomy. The only people with power in the Empire were Persians and their appointees. This was true for Judah as well. The High Priest had no real power; there was no theocracy. The wars that periodically engulfed the Levant in the fourth century temporarily pulled the ruling governors and satraps away from Judah, and during these times, the Judean priesthood may have capitalized on the brief absence of Persian officials to mint coins, but they achieved their longed-for independence only much later, under the Maccabees.
Check nearby libraries
Buy this book
Edition | Availability |
---|---|
1
The Priest And The Great King: Temple-palace Relations In The Persian Empire
July 2004, Eisenbrauns
Hardcover
in English
- Revision of the author's thesis (doctoral)
1575060906 9781575060903
|
zzzz
Libraries near you:
WorldCat
|
2
Priest and the Great King: Temple-palace Relations In The Persian Empire
2004, Eisenbrauns
Ebook
in English
- Revision of the author's thesis (doctoral)
1575065509 9781575065502
|
aaaa
Libraries near you:
WorldCat
|
Book Details
Edition Notes
Classifications
The Physical Object
ID Numbers
Community Reviews (0)
Feedback?September 15, 2022 | Edited by OnFrATa | Edited without comment. |
December 8, 2020 | Edited by MARC Bot | import existing book |
August 14, 2020 | Edited by ImportBot | import existing book |
April 28, 2010 | Edited by Open Library Bot | Linked existing covers to the work. |
December 10, 2009 | Created by WorkBot | add works page |