An edition of Must we defend Nazis? (1997)

Must we defend Nazis?

hate speech, pornography, and the new First Amendment

  • 0 Ratings
  • 0 Want to read
  • 0 Currently reading
  • 0 Have read

My Reading Lists:

Create a new list

Check-In

×Close
Add an optional check-in date. Check-in dates are used to track yearly reading goals.
Today

  • 0 Ratings
  • 0 Want to read
  • 0 Currently reading
  • 0 Have read

Buy this book

Last edited by MARC Bot
August 6, 2024 | History
An edition of Must we defend Nazis? (1997)

Must we defend Nazis?

hate speech, pornography, and the new First Amendment

  • 0 Ratings
  • 0 Want to read
  • 0 Currently reading
  • 0 Have read

Speech in any sort of meaningful sense requires equal dignity, equal access, and equal respect on the parts of all of the speakers in a dialogue; free speech, in other words, presupposes equality. The authors argue for a system of free speech that takes into account nuance, context-sensitivity, and competing values such as human dignity and equal protection of the law.

Publish Date
Language
English
Pages
224

Buy this book

Previews available in: English

Edition Availability
Cover of: Must we defend Nazis?
Must we defend Nazis?: hate speech, pornography, and the new First Amendment
1997, New York University Press
in English

Add another edition?

Book Details


Table of Contents

The opening salvo : naming the harm. Words that wound : how racist hate speech harms the victim. Law's earliest responses
Pornography and harm to women : how even social scientists have sometimes failed to see the need for relief
The assault on the citadel : legal realism shakes up orthodoxy. First Amendment formalism is giving way to First Amendment legal realism
Campus anti-racism rules : constitutional narratives in collision, or, why there are always two ways of looking at a speech controversy
Images of the outsider : why the First Amendment marketplace cannot remedy systemic social ills. Social science and narrative theory are questioning faith in the freemarket of ideas
Retreat to policy analysis : "even if what the crits say is so ..." Paternalistic arguments against hate-speech rules : pressure valves and bloodied chickens. The liberals' response to the crumbling of certainty
The toughlove school : neoconservative arguments against hate- speech regulation. ("I just let it roll off my back")
"But America wouldn't be America anymore" : the experience ofother countries shows that adopting hate-speech rules would not cause the skies to fall; America would be even more american
"From where I sit"
The special problems of judges and progressive lawyers. Hateful speech, loving communities : why judges are sometimes slower than others at seeing the need for reform
"The speech we hate" : the romantic appeal of First Amendment absolutism. Does defending Nazis really strengthen the system of free speech?

Edition Notes

Includes bibliographical references (p. 163-215) and index.

Published in
New York

Classifications

Dewey Decimal Class
342.73/0853, 347.302853
Library of Congress
KF4772 .D45 1997, KF4772.D45 1997

The Physical Object

Pagination
xii, 224 p. ;
Number of pages
224

ID Numbers

Open Library
OL987257M
Internet Archive
mustwedefendnazi00delg
ISBN 10
0814718582
LCCN
96025368
OCLC/WorldCat
35172518
Goodreads
3724070

Community Reviews (0)

Feedback?
No community reviews have been submitted for this work.

Lists

This work does not appear on any lists.

History

Download catalog record: RDF / JSON
August 6, 2024 Edited by MARC Bot import existing book
August 4, 2020 Edited by ImportBot import existing book
December 4, 2010 Edited by Open Library Bot Added subjects from MARC records.
April 28, 2010 Edited by Open Library Bot Linked existing covers to the work.
December 9, 2009 Created by WorkBot add works page