Legal language does not qualify as a language in the same way as French, Finnish, or Arabic, for example.
An edition of Comparative Legal Linguistics
(2006)
Comparative Legal Linguistics
by Heikki E. S. Mattila
- 0 Ratings
- 0 Want to read
- 0 Currently reading
- 0 Have read
Share
×Close
This edition doesn't have a description yet. Can you add one?
Check nearby libraries
Buy this book
Previews available in: English
Showing 2 featured editions. View all 2 editions?
| Edition | Availability |
|---|---|
1
Comparative Legal Linguistics: Language of Law, Latin and Modern Lingua Francas
2016, Taylor & Francis Group
in English
1138255599 9781138255593
|
zzzz
Libraries near you:
WorldCat
|
2
Comparative Legal Linguistics
November 24, 2006, Ashgate Publishing, Ashgate
Hardcover
in English
0754648745 9780754648741
|
aaaa
Libraries near you:
WorldCat
|
Book Details
First Sentence
"Legal language does not qualify as a language in the same way as French, Finnish, or Arabic, for example."
Classifications
The Physical Object
ID Numbers
Source records
Excerpts
added anonymously.
Community Reviews (0)
Feedback?
History
- Created April 29, 2008
- 14 revisions
Wikipedia citation
×CloseCopy and paste this code into your Wikipedia page. Need help?
| July 20, 2023 | Edited by ImportBot | import existing book |
| March 7, 2023 | Edited by MARC Bot | import existing book |
| December 28, 2022 | Edited by MARC Bot | import existing book |
| September 16, 2021 | Edited by ImportBot | import existing book |
| April 29, 2008 | Created by an anonymous user | Imported from amazon.com record |