"Proclus' On the Existence of Evils is not a commentary, but helps to compensate for the dearth of Neoplatonist ethical commentaries. The central question addressed in the work is: How can there be evil in a providential world? Neoplatonists agree that it cannot be caused by higher and worthier beings. Plotinus had said that evil is matter, which, unlike Aristotle, he collapsed into mere privation or lack, thus reducing its reality. He also protected higher causes from responsibility by saying that evil may result from a combination of goods. Proclus objects: evil is real, and not the mere privation of form. Rather, it is a parasite feeding off good. Parasites have no proper cause, and higher beings are thus vindicated as being the causes only of the good off which evil feeds."--BOOK JACKET.
Previews available in: English
Subjects
| Edition | Availability |
|---|---|
1
|
zzzz
|
2
|
aaaa
|
3
|
zzzz
|
|
4
|
zzzz
|
Book Details
Edition Notes
Includes bibliographical references (p. [147]-153) and indexes.
Series statement on jacket.
Classifications
The Physical Object
Edition Identifiers
Work Identifiers
Community Reviews (0)
Lists
Wikipedia citation
Copy and paste this code into your Wikipedia page.
{{cite book|author=Proclus Diadochus |date=2003 |orig-date=1978 |title=On the existence of evils |url=https://archive.org/details/onexistenceevils00proc |publication-place=Ithaca, N.Y |publisher=Cornell University Press |isbn=0-8014-4100-5 |lccn=2003043882 |oclc=51922443 |ol=3683771M}}