Check nearby libraries
Buy this book

Many studies highlight the challenges facing incumbent firms in responding effectively to major technological transitions. While some authors argue that these challenges can be overcome by firms possessing what have been called "dynamic capabilities," little work has described in detail the critical resources that these capabilities leverage, or the processes through which these resources accumulate and evolve. This paper explores these issues through an in-depth exploratory case study of one firm that has demonstrated consistently strong performance in an industry that is highly dynamic and uncertain.
Check nearby libraries
Buy this book

Edition | Availability |
---|---|
1
Intellectual property, architecture, and the management of technological transitions: evidence from Microsoft Corporation
2006, Division of Research, Harvard Business School
in English
- Rev.
|
aaaa
|
2
Intellectual property, architecture, and the management of technological transitions: evidence from Microsoft Corporation
2002, Division of Research, Harvard Business School
in English
|
zzzz
|
Book Details
Edition Notes
Originally published: c2002.
"Revised 03/06"--Publisher's website.
Includes bibliographical references.
The Physical Object
Edition Identifiers
Work Identifiers
Work Description
A number of studies highlight the challenges facing incumbent firms in responding effectively to major technological transitions. While some authors argue that these challenges can be overcome by firms possessing "dynamic capabilities," little work hasdescribed in detail the processes through which such capabilities evolve or the unique resources that they leverage. This paper explores these issues through an in-depth study of Microsoft, one of the leading firms in the software industry. We provide evidence that Microsoft's product line performance has been consistently strong over a period of time in which there have been several major technological transitions and indicator that the firm possesses dynamic capabilities. We examine one ofthese transitions in detail the rise of the World Wide Web to show that this strong performance was also evident when entering new product segments. We then present qualitative data to shed light on this pattern of success, focusing on the way the firm develops and evolves its intellectual property. Specifically, Microsoft codifies knowledge in the form of software "components," which can be leveraged across multiple product lines and accessed by firms developing complementary products. We argue that this software component model represents the unique resource that enables the firm to respond effectively to technological transitions. We illustrate our argument by describing Microsoft's response to two recent transitions.
Community Reviews (0)
History
- Created February 11, 2025
- 1 revision
Wikipedia citation
×CloseCopy and paste this code into your Wikipedia page. Need help?
February 11, 2025 | Created by MARC Bot | Imported from Harvard University record |