An edition of A supplement to the first and second parts of lay baptism invalid, shewing that the heretical and schismatical baptisms which some ancient churches esteem'd to have been valid, were not lay baptisms, in the opinion of those churches (1714)

A supplement to the first and second parts of lay baptism invalid, shewing that the heretical and schismatical baptisms which some ancient churches esteem'd to have been valid, were not lay baptisms, in the opinion of those churches

In answer to the second part of Mr. Bingham's pretended Scholastical history of lay baptism and prov'd out of that same book, and the other writings of Mr. Bingham

by

A supplement to the first and second parts of ...
Laurence, R., Laurence, R.
Not in Library

My Reading Lists:

Create a new list

Check-In

×Close
Add an optional check-in date. Check-in dates are used to track yearly reading goals.
Today
Notes
Notes

Check nearby libraries

Buy this book

Last edited by MARC Bot
December 22, 2022 | History
Edit
An edition of A supplement to the first and second parts of lay baptism invalid, shewing that the heretical and schismatical baptisms which some ancient churches esteem'd to have been valid, were not lay baptisms, in the opinion of those churches (1714)

A supplement to the first and second parts of lay baptism invalid, shewing that the heretical and schismatical baptisms which some ancient churches esteem'd to have been valid, were not lay baptisms, in the opinion of those churches

In answer to the second part of Mr. Bingham's pretended Scholastical history of lay baptism and prov'd out of that same book, and the other writings of Mr. Bingham

by

This edition doesn't have a description yet. Can you add one?

Publish Date
Publisher
Printed by G. James for H. Clements
Language
English
Pages
151

Check nearby libraries

Buy this book

Subjects

Baptism, Early works to 1800

Showing 1 featured edition. View all 1 editions?

Edition Availability
Cover of: A supplement to the first and second parts of lay baptism invalid, shewing that the heretical and schismatical baptisms which some ancient churches esteem'd to have been valid, were not lay baptisms, in the opinion of those churches
A supplement to the first and second parts of lay baptism invalid, shewing that the heretical and schismatical baptisms which some ancient churches esteem'd to have been valid, were not lay baptisms, in the opinion of those churches: In answer to the second part of Mr. Bingham's pretended Scholastical history of lay baptism and prov'd out of that same book, and the other writings of Mr. Bingham
1714, Printed by G. James for H. Clements
in English
  • Not in Library
Libraries near you: WorldCat

Add another edition?

Book Details

Edition Notes

Published anonymously.

Published in
London
Other Titles
Lay baptism invalid, supplement.

The Physical Object

Pagination
[16], 151 p.
Number of pages
151

ID Numbers

Open Library
OL44838023M
OCLC/WorldCat
3924616

Source records

marc_columbia MARC record

Community Reviews (0)

Feedback?
No community reviews have been submitted for this work.

Lists

This work does not appear on any lists.

History

Download catalog record: RDF / JSON / OPDS | Wikipedia citation
December 22, 2022 Created by MARC Bot Imported from marc_columbia MARC record