B Towards developing a theory of systematic biases about strategies, I analyze strategic implications of a particular bias: wishful thinking about the strategies. Considering canonical state spaces for strategic uncertainty, I identify a player as a wishful thinker at a state if she hopes to enjoy the highest payoff that is consistent with her information about the others' strategies at that state. I develop a straightforward elimination process that characterizes the strategy profiles that are consistent with wishful thinking, mutual knowledge of wishful thinking, and so on. Every pure-strategy Nash equilibrium is consistent with common knowledge of wishful thinking. For generic two-person games, I further show that the pure Nash equilibrium strategies are the only strategies that are consistent with common knowledge of wishful thinking, providing an unusual epistemic characterization for equilibrium strategies. I also investigate the strategic implications of rationality and ex-post optimism, the situation in which a player's expected payoff weakly exceeds her actual payoff. I show that, in generic games with monotonic payoff functions, these strategic implications are identical to those of wishful thinking. Keywords: optimism, strategic uncertainty, wishful thinking, self-serving biases, common-prior assumption, equilibrium. JEL Classifications: C72, D80.