An edition of A critical essay on oil-painting
(1781)
A critical essay on oil-painting
proving that the art of painting in oil was known before the pretended discovery of John and Hubert van Eyck; to which are added, Theophilus de arte pingendi Eraclius de artibus Romanorum. And a review of Farinator's Lumen animæ, by R. E. Raspe.
by Rudolf Erich Raspe
- 0 Ratings
- 0 Want to read
- 0 Currently reading
- 0 Have read
Share
×Close
This edition doesn't have a description yet. Can you add one?
Buy this book
Showing 2 featured editions. View all 2 editions?
| Edition | Availability |
|---|---|
1
A critical essay on oil-painting: proving that the art of painting in oil was known before the pretended discovery of John and Hubert van Eyck; to which are added, Theophilus de arte pingendi Eraclius de artibus Romanorum. And a review of Farinator's Lumen animæ, by R. E. Raspe.
1781, printed for the author, by H. Goldney; and sold by T. Cadell
Microform
in English
|
aaaa
|
|
2
A critical essay on oil-painting: proving that the art of painting in oil was known before the pretended discovery of John and Hubert van Eyck; to which are added, Theophilus de arte pingendi Eraclius de artibus Romanorum. And a review of Farinator's Lumen animæ, by R. E. Raspe.
1781, printed for the author, by H. Goldney; and sold by T. Cadell
Microform
in English
|
zzzz
|
Book Details
Edition Notes
Microfilm. Woodbridge, CT Research Publications, Inc., 1983. 1 reel ; 35mm. (The Eighteenth Century ; reel 420, no. 12).
The Physical Object
ID Numbers
Community Reviews (0)
Feedback?
History
- Created October 21, 2008
- 3 revisions
Wikipedia citation
×CloseCopy and paste this code into your Wikipedia page. Need help?
| July 31, 2012 | Edited by VacuumBot | Updated format '[microform];' to 'Microform'; cleaned up pagination |
| December 15, 2009 | Edited by WorkBot | link works |
| October 21, 2008 | Created by ImportBot | Imported from University of Toronto MARC record. |