Savings and Loan Society, respondent, v. Alexander Austin, appellant, and Bartlett Doe, et al., respondents, v. Alexander Austin, appellant.

Oral argument of J.P. Hoge, of counsel for appellant, in support of the constitutionality of the revenue law of California.

Savings and Loan Society, respondent, v. Alexander Austin, appellant, and Bartlett Doe, et al., respondents, v. Alexander Austin, appellant. by Joseph P. Hoge, Joseph P. Hoge
Preview

Only you can see this

Save Note

Download Options

Last edited by MARC Bot
May 16, 2017 | History

Savings and Loan Society, respondent, v. Alexander Austin, appellant, and Bartlett Doe, et al., respondents, v. Alexander Austin, appellant.

Oral argument of J.P. Hoge, of counsel for appellant, in support of the constitutionality of the revenue law of California.

This work doesn't have a description yet. Can you add one?

Publish Date
Language
English
Pages
56

Previews available in: English

Book Details


Edition Notes

Published in
Sacramento

The Physical Object

Pagination
1 p. L, 56 p.
Number of pages
56

Edition Identifiers

Open Library
OL23331374M
Internet Archive
savingsloansocie00hoge
OCLC/WorldCat
12652523

Work Identifiers

Work ID
OL7896076W

Source records

Community Reviews (0)

No community reviews have been submitted for this work.

Lists

Download catalog record: RDF / JSON