This paper analyses data on union and employer rankings of different panels of arbitrators in an actual arbitration system. A random utility model of bargainer preferences is developed and estimated. The estimates indicate that unions and employers have similar preferences, in favor of lawyers, more experienced arbitrators, and arbitrators who seem to have previously favored their side. Alternative rankings models, which are estimated to test whether bargainers rank arbitrators strategically, reveal no evidence of strategic behavior.
| Edition | Availability |
|---|---|
|
1
An Analysis of the Selection of Arbitrators
1986, National Bureau of Economic Research
electronic resource
in English
|
aaaa
|
Book Details
Edition Notes
May 1986.
Access restricted to subscribers.
Hardcopy version available to institutional subscribers.
System requirements: Adobe [Acrobat] Reader required for PDF files.
Mode of access: World Wide Web.
The Physical Object
Edition Identifiers
Work Identifiers
Community Reviews (0)
Loading carousel