Geosynthetic reinforced soil for low volume bridge abutments

  • 0 Ratings
  • 0 Want to read
  • 0 Currently reading
  • 0 Have read
Geosynthetic reinforced soil for low volume b ...
White, David J. Ph. D.
Not in Library

My Reading Lists:

Create a new list

Check-In

×Close
Add an optional check-in date. Check-in dates are used to track yearly reading goals.
Today

  • 0 Ratings
  • 0 Want to read
  • 0 Currently reading
  • 0 Have read

Buy this book

Last edited by MARC Bot
November 12, 2020 | History

Geosynthetic reinforced soil for low volume bridge abutments

  • 0 Ratings
  • 0 Want to read
  • 0 Currently reading
  • 0 Have read

This report presents a review of literature on geosynthetic reinforced soil (GRS) bridge abutments, and test results and analysis from two field demonstration projects (Bridge 1 and Bridge 2) conducted in Buchanan County, Iowa, to evaluate the feasibility and cost effectiveness of the use of GRS bridge abutments on low volume roads (LVRs). The two projects included GRS abutment substructure and railroad flat car (RRFC) bridge superstructure. The construction costs varied from $43k to $49k, which was about 50 to 60% lower than the expected costs for building a conventional bridge. Settlement monitoring at both bridges indicated maximum settlements less than 1 in. during the monitoring phase. Laboratory testing on GRS fill material, field testing, and in ground instrumentation, abutment settlement monitoring, and bridge live load (LL) testing were conducted on Bridge 2. Laboratory testing on aggregate fill with and without geosynthetic material showed improvements in shear strength parameters and permanent deformation behavior when reinforced with geosynthetic due to lateral restraint effect at the soil-geosynthetic interface. Bridge LL testing under static loads indicated maximum deflections close to 0.9 in and non-uniform deflections transversely across the bridge due to poor load transfer between RRFCs. The ratio of horizontal to vertical stresses in the GRS fill was lo3 (less than 0.25), indicating low lateral stress on the soil surrounding GRS fill material. Bearing capacity analysis at Bridge 2 indicated lower than recommended factor of safety (FS) values due to low ultimate reinforcement strength of the geosynthetic material used in this study and relatively weak underlying foundation layer. Global stability analysis of the GRS abutment structure revealed lower FS than recommended against sliding failure along the interface of the GRS fill material and the underlying weak foundation layer. Design and construction recommendations to help improve the stability and performance of the GRS abutment structures on future projects are provided in this report.

Publish Date
Language
English
Pages
115

Buy this book

Edition Availability
Cover of: Geosynthetic reinforced soil for low volume bridge abutments
Geosynthetic reinforced soil for low volume bridge abutments
2012, Center for Earthworks Engineering Research, Iowa State University
in English

Add another edition?

Book Details


Edition Notes

"January 2012."

Includes bibliographical references (p. 110-113).

Final report.

Also available via the Internet.

Sponsored by the Iowa Highway Research Board and the Iowa Dept. of Transportation IHRB project TR-621 InTrans project 10-380

Published in
Ames, IA

Classifications

Library of Congress
TG325 .G46 2012

The Physical Object

Pagination
xvii, 115 p.
Number of pages
115

ID Numbers

Open Library
OL30946363M
LCCN
2013412390
OCLC/WorldCat
779490585

Community Reviews (0)

Feedback?
No community reviews have been submitted for this work.

Lists

This work does not appear on any lists.

History

Download catalog record: RDF / JSON
November 12, 2020 Created by MARC Bot import new book