https://sites.google.com/site/induscivilizationsite/
History is my Passion and Hobby. 20 years ago I came across the theory of Professor Wunderlich, that Cretan Palace was a necropolis and not a place of living. I applied the same principle to Indus sites and have been collecting evidences in this regard. During the process of writing the book, I observed that the Indus scripts are depicting the month and the date of death of a person, and it is a logo-gram.
Abstract of Necropolis theory on Indus Valley civilization
The name Mohenjo Daro itself means, “It was the mound of the dead,” and the name itself is self-explanatory. The view that nearly 50,000 people were living at the time of its demise in Mohenjo Daro is not acceptable theory, because such crowded condition would have resulted in outbreak of diseases. It is likely that Indus people built mortuary houses in these sites and these clustered mortuary houses give the impression of a city. The structure identified as granary is doubtful; the photographs available at the web site (Harappa.com) shows that it looks more like a brick kiln rather than a granary. Storing grains in such large scale is a difficult job, grains will rot, and there will be insect and rat attack; considering all these factors it can be concluded that the structure was not a granary but could be a brick kiln. The photo of blocked drain presented in the same web site shows that it could be simply an entrance to a tomb. Photograph of the well shows that it could be a tunnel (Shaft Grave) to inner burial chamber at a lower level, but it looks like a well. The potteries also look like that as if they have been tailor made to needs of funeral practices. Some of them show a protruding tube, meant for funnelling the sacrificial blood into ground. The “toilets” described by archaeologists seem to be “ordinary holes” meant for pouring blood or sacrificial goods into underground burial chambers.
Abstract of calendar theory on deciphering of Indus script
It is likely that Indus seals were “tokens of memory aids” containing information about date and month of shrartha ceremony. The new theory being proposed is that the Indus symbols represent the “star constellations” and in turn, the star constellations represent days of moon calendar month. The “Fish symbol” could be indicating “month” and “jar symbol” could be indicating “Day.” Both these symbols had phonetic sound of “Mee” and “Vu” respectively. This explains the fundamental idea behind seals of Indus civilization. The best part of this finding is that parallel corroborative evidence between Indus script and existing Hindu text has been found. The pictograms shown in the seals are coinciding with the symbols presented in Jyotisha Vedanga. There were two sets of symbols used in Indus valley. One set of symbol is based on “Kalan body parts” and other set was based on “variegated symbols” depending on the shape of constellations. Out of these two sets of symbols, the Kalan symbols seem to be older and were most likely used by the Dravidians. The second set of symbols was based on “variegated symbols” and was used by Aryans.
Reading Log
This reader has chosen to make their Reading Log private.
