What is a book?
That question isn't that hard, compared to "What is a work?"
It feels weird to call a random collection of short stories a "work", instead of using that term for each individual story (see http://openlibrary.org/works/OL152264W/The_Dunwich_horror for an example which contains three actual works, "The Dunwich Horror", "The Shadow Out of Time" and "The Thing on the Doorstep")
Hi-storian
Hi there. I'm new to the community. Surprised no one's chimed in on this before. The way I see this case, what you have is a "collective work" that, in turn, includes three separate works. Collective works can take a number of different forms, like collections of short stories, in your case, or collections of scientific papers presented as the proceedings of a conference. In either case, yes, the book is a "work" and the individual stories or papers should be listed as the Table of Contents. Only if the individual stories or papers were published separately as a stand-alone book would it be considered a "work".
History
- Created March 18, 2013
- 4 revisions
February 19, 2016 | Edited by Hi-storian | Converting format to convention used in Guidelines. |
February 19, 2016 | Edited by Hi-storian | Adding reply |
April 9, 2013 | Edited by Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren | Edited without comment. |
March 18, 2013 | Created by Ben Companjen | asked the question "what is a book?" |