Buy this book
![Loading indicator](/images/ajax-loader-bar.gif)
"When doing growth accounting, should we use ex post or ex ante measures of user costs to calculate the contribution of capital? The answer, based on a simple model of temporary equilibrium, is that ex post is better in theory. In practice researchers usually calculate ex post user costs by assuming that the rate of return is equalised across assets. But this is only true if expectations are correct. A numerical example shows that either ex ante or ex post can be closer to the true measure, depending on the parameters. I propose a hybrid method that makes use of elements of both approaches. I test this and the other methods using data for 31 UK industries"--London School of Economics web site.
Buy this book
![Loading indicator](/images/ajax-loader-bar.gif)
Showing 1 featured edition. View all 1 editions?
Edition | Availability |
---|---|
1
Ex post versus ex ante measures of the user cost of capital
2005, Centre for Economic Performance, London School of Economics and Political Science
Electronic resource
in English
|
aaaa
|
Book Details
Edition Notes
Also available in print.
Includes bibliographical references.
Title from PDF file as viewed on 7/25/2005.
System requirements: Adobe Acrobat Reader.
Mode of access: World Wide Web.
Classifications
The Physical Object
ID Numbers
Source records
Community Reviews (0)
Feedback?History
- Created April 1, 2008
- 5 revisions
Wikipedia citation
×CloseCopy and paste this code into your Wikipedia page. Need help?
December 13, 2020 | Edited by MARC Bot | import existing book |
August 4, 2012 | Edited by VacuumBot | Updated format '[electronic resource] /' to 'Electronic resource' |
December 12, 2009 | Edited by WorkBot | link works |
October 31, 2008 | Edited by ImportBot | add URIs from original MARC record |
April 1, 2008 | Created by an anonymous user | Imported from Scriblio MARC record |