Ex post versus ex ante measures of the user cost of capital

  • 0 Ratings
  • 0 Want to read
  • 0 Currently reading
  • 0 Have read
Ex post versus ex ante measures of the user c ...
Nicholas Oulton
Not in Library

My Reading Lists:

Create a new list

Check-In

×Close
Add an optional check-in date. Check-in dates are used to track yearly reading goals.
Today

  • 0 Ratings
  • 0 Want to read
  • 0 Currently reading
  • 0 Have read

Buy this book

Last edited by MARC Bot
December 13, 2020 | History

Ex post versus ex ante measures of the user cost of capital

  • 0 Ratings
  • 0 Want to read
  • 0 Currently reading
  • 0 Have read

"When doing growth accounting, should we use ex post or ex ante measures of user costs to calculate the contribution of capital? The answer, based on a simple model of temporary equilibrium, is that ex post is better in theory. In practice researchers usually calculate ex post user costs by assuming that the rate of return is equalised across assets. But this is only true if expectations are correct. A numerical example shows that either ex ante or ex post can be closer to the true measure, depending on the parameters. I propose a hybrid method that makes use of elements of both approaches. I test this and the other methods using data for 31 UK industries"--London School of Economics web site.

Buy this book

Edition Availability
Cover of: Ex post versus ex ante measures of the user cost of capital
Ex post versus ex ante measures of the user cost of capital
2005, Centre for Economic Performance, London School of Economics and Political Science
Electronic resource in English

Add another edition?

Book Details


Edition Notes

Also available in print.
Includes bibliographical references.
Title from PDF file as viewed on 7/25/2005.
System requirements: Adobe Acrobat Reader.
Mode of access: World Wide Web.

Published in
[London]
Series
Discussion paper ;, no. 698, Discussion paper (London School of Economics and Political Science. Centre for Economic Performance : Online) ;, no. 698.

Classifications

Library of Congress
HC10

The Physical Object

Format
Electronic resource

ID Numbers

Open Library
OL3479037M
LCCN
2005619342

Community Reviews (0)

Feedback?
No community reviews have been submitted for this work.

Lists

This work does not appear on any lists.

History

Download catalog record: RDF / JSON / OPDS | Wikipedia citation
December 13, 2020 Edited by MARC Bot import existing book
August 4, 2012 Edited by VacuumBot Updated format '[electronic resource] /' to 'Electronic resource'
December 12, 2009 Edited by WorkBot link works
October 31, 2008 Edited by ImportBot add URIs from original MARC record
April 1, 2008 Created by an anonymous user Imported from Scriblio MARC record