An edition of The U.S. Supreme Court (2010)

The U.S. Supreme Court

  • 0 Ratings
  • 1 Want to read
  • 0 Currently reading
  • 0 Have read
The U.S. Supreme Court
Margaret Haerens
Not in Library

My Reading Lists:

Create a new list

Check-In

×Close
Add an optional check-in date. Check-in dates are used to track yearly reading goals.
Today

  • 0 Ratings
  • 1 Want to read
  • 0 Currently reading
  • 0 Have read

Buy this book

Last edited by ImportBot
January 9, 2011 | History
An edition of The U.S. Supreme Court (2010)

The U.S. Supreme Court

  • 0 Ratings
  • 1 Want to read
  • 0 Currently reading
  • 0 Have read

Collects essays that offer varying perspectives on issues related to the Supreme Court of the United States.

Publish Date
Publisher
Greenhaven Press
Language
English
Pages
233

Buy this book

Edition Availability
Cover of: The U.S. Supreme Court
The U.S. Supreme Court
2010, Greenhaven Press
in English

Add another edition?

Book Details


Table of Contents

The U.S. Supreme Court can be a check on the executive branch / David von Drehle
The U.S. Supreme Court is not an effective check on the executive branch / Lisa L. Miller
The U.S. Supreme Court should decide the rights of enemy combatants / David D. Cole
The fate of enemy combatants is not a matter for judicial review / Mark R. Levin
Some conservative justices have violated the rule of law for political reasons / Center for American Progress
Liberals exercise too much control over the U.S. judiciary / Mark W. Smith
The U.S. judiciary should be independent and impartial / Frederic F. Fleishauer
The U.S. Supreme Court should uphold sodomy laws / Robert Peters
The U.S. Supreme Court should reverse sodomy laws / Randy E. Barnett
The U.S. Supreme Court should overturn Roe v. Wade / James F. Pontuso
The U.S. Supreme Court should not overturn Roe v. Wade / Cass Sunstein
The U.S. Supreme Court should limit the role of religion in public life / Frederick S. Lane
The U.S. Supreme Court should not limit the role of religion in public life / Robert Bork
Political ideology is relevant in U.S. Supreme Court confirmation hearings / Center for American Progress contributor
Political ideology is not relevant for judicial nominees / Orrin Hatch
Religious views are a relevant consideration for U.S. Supreme Court nominees / Annie Laurie Gaylor
There should not be a religious litmus test for U.S. Supreme Court nominees / Stephen B. Presser and Charles E. Rice
There should be term limits for U.S. Supreme Court justices / Doug Bandow
There are advantages and disadvantages to term limits for U.S. Supreme Court justices / Richard A. Posner
The U.S. Supreme Court should refer to foreign court decisions / Austen L. Parrish
The U.S. Supreme Court should not refer to foreign court decisions / Phyllis Schlafly
Judicial activism is necessary in certain circumstances / Clint Bolick
U.S. Supreme Court justices should not practice judicial activism / Robert P. George.

Edition Notes

Includes bibliographical references (p. 219-222) and index.

Published in
Farmington Hills, MI
Series
Opposing viewpoints series, Opposing viewpoints series (Unnumbered)
Other Titles
United States Supreme Court

Classifications

Dewey Decimal Class
347.73/26
Library of Congress
KF8742 .U18 2010

The Physical Object

Pagination
233 p. :
Number of pages
233

ID Numbers

Open Library
OL24585412M
ISBN 10
0737745444, 0737745452
ISBN 13
9780737745443, 9780737745450
LCCN
2009025868
OCLC/WorldCat
317921727

Community Reviews (0)

Feedback?
No community reviews have been submitted for this work.

Lists

This work does not appear on any lists.

History

Download catalog record: RDF / JSON / OPDS | Wikipedia citation
January 9, 2011 Created by ImportBot Imported from Library of Congress MARC record