An edition of I. Goldtree, plaintiff, vs. John D. Spreckels, defendant (1900)

I. Goldtree, plaintiff, vs. John D. Spreckels, defendant.

Opinion of Hon. E.S. Torrance, judge of the Superior Court, upon the validity of certain street improvement bonds, and holding that the decision in Norwood vs. Baker, 172 U.S. Reports, page 269, does not affect the constitutionality of the Vrooman Act.

by

  • 0 Ratings
  • 0 Want to read
  • 0 Currently reading
  • 0 Have read
Cover of: I. Goldtree, plaintiff, vs. John D. Spreckels, defendant. by California. Superior Court (San Diego County)
Read Listen

My Reading Lists:

Create a new list

Check-In

×Close
Add an optional check-in date. Check-in dates are used to track yearly reading goals.
Today
Notes
  • 0 Ratings
  • 0 Want to read
  • 0 Currently reading
  • 0 Have read
Notes

Download Options

Check nearby libraries

Buy this book

Last edited by ImportBot
August 6, 2012 | History
Edit
An edition of I. Goldtree, plaintiff, vs. John D. Spreckels, defendant (1900)

I. Goldtree, plaintiff, vs. John D. Spreckels, defendant.

Opinion of Hon. E.S. Torrance, judge of the Superior Court, upon the validity of certain street improvement bonds, and holding that the decision in Norwood vs. Baker, 172 U.S. Reports, page 269, does not affect the constitutionality of the Vrooman Act.

by

  • 0 Ratings
  • 0 Want to read
  • 0 Currently reading
  • 0 Have read

This edition doesn't have a description yet. Can you add one?

Publish Date
Publisher
Frandzen, Bumgardner & Co., Printers
Language
English
Pages
58

Check nearby libraries

Buy this book

Previews available in: English

Subjects
Tax assessment, Taxation, Streets, Municipal bonds

Showing 1 featured edition. View all 1 editions?

Edition Availability
Cover of: I. Goldtree, plaintiff, vs. John D. Spreckels, defendant.
I. Goldtree, plaintiff, vs. John D. Spreckels, defendant.: Opinion of Hon. E.S. Torrance, judge of the Superior Court, upon the validity of certain street improvement bonds, and holding that the decision in Norwood vs. Baker, 172 U.S. Reports, page 269, does not affect the constitutionality of the Vrooman Act.
1900, Frandzen, Bumgardner & Co., Printers
in English
Libraries near you: WorldCat

Add another edition?

Book Details

Edition Notes

Published in
[San Diego?]
Other Titles
Vrooman Act, Constitutionality of the.

The Physical Object

Pagination
[3]-58 p.
Number of pages
58

ID Numbers

Open Library
OL22883154M
Internet Archive
igoldtreeplainti00cali
OCLC/WorldCat
12619531

Source records

Internet Archive item record

Community Reviews (0)

Feedback?
No community reviews have been submitted for this work.

Lists

This work does not appear on any lists.

History

Download catalog record: RDF / JSON / OPDS | Wikipedia citation
August 6, 2012 Edited by ImportBot import new book
April 13, 2010 Edited by Open Library Bot Linked existing covers to the edition.
December 15, 2009 Edited by WorkBot link works
January 30, 2009 Created by ImportBot Imported from Internet Archive item record