An edition of An argument proving that the abrogation of King James by the people of England from the regal throne, and the promotion of the Prince of Orange, one of the royal family, to the throne of the kingdom in his stead, was according to the constitution of the English government, and prescribed by it (1692)

An argument proving that the abrogation of King James by the people of England from the regal throne, and the promotion of the Prince of Orange, one of the royal family, to the throne of the kingdom in his stead, was according to the constitution of the English government, and prescribed by it

in opposition to all the false and treacherous hypotheses, of usurpation, conquest, desertion, and of taking the powers that are upon content

by Samuel Johnson (pamphleteer)

An argument proving that the abrogation of Ki...

Samuel Johnson (pamphleteer), ...

Nearby Libraries

My Reading Lists:

Use this Work

Create a new list

Last edited by MARC Bot

December 10, 2025 | History

Edit

An argument proving that the abrogation of King James by the people of England from the regal throne, and the promotion of the Prince of Orange, one of the royal family, to the throne of the kingdom in his stead, was according to the constitution of the English government, and prescribed by it

in opposition to all the false and treacherous hypotheses, of usurpation, conquest, desertion, and of taking the powers that are upon content

by Samuel Johnson (pamphleteer)

This edition doesn't have a description yet. Can you add one?

Publish Date

1692

Publisher

Printed for the author

Language

English

Pages

Edition	Availability
1 An argument proving, that the abrogation of King James by the people of England from the regal throne, and the promotion of the Prince of Orange, one of the royal family, to the throne of the kingdom in his stead, was according to the Constitution of the English government, and prescribed by it: in opposition to all the false and treacherous hypotheses of usurpation, conquest, desertion, and of taking the powers that are upon content 1693, Printed for the author Microform in English - The fifth edition	zzzz Nearby Libraries
2 An argument proving that the abrogation of King James by the people of England from the regal throne, and the promotion of the Prince of Orange, one of the royal family, to the throne of the kingdom in his stead, was according to the constitution of the English government, and prescribed by it: in opposition to all the false and treacherous hypotheses, of usurpation, conquest, desertion, and of taking the powers that are upon content 1692, Printed for the author Microform in English	aaaa Nearby Libraries
3 An argument proving that the abrogation of King James by the people of England from the regal throne, and the promotion of the Prince of Orange, one of the royal family, to the throne of the kingdom in his stead, was according to the constitution of the English government and prescribed by it: in opposition to all the false and treacherous hypotheses ... 1692, Printed for the author, and are to be sold by Richard Baldwin Microform in English	zzzz Nearby Libraries
4 An argument proving, that the abrogation of King James by the people of England from the regal throne, and the promotion of the Prince of Orange, one of the royal family, to the throne of the kingdom in his stead, was according to the constitution of the English government, and prescribed by it.: In opposition to all the false and treacherous hypotheses, of usurpation, conquest, desertion, and of taking the powers that are upon content. 1692, The Author; and are to be sold by R. Baldwin in English	zzzz Nearby Libraries

Add another edition?

Book Details

Edition Notes

Reproduction of original in Union Theological Seminary Library, New York

Wing J822

Microfilm. Ann Arbor, Mich. : University Microfilms International, 1979. 1 microfilm reel ; 35 mm. (Early English books, 1641-1700 ; 985:24)

s 1979 miu n

Published in: London
Series: Early English books, 1641-1700 -- 985:24
Other Titles: An argument proving that the abrogation of King James

The Physical Object

Format: Microform
Pagination: 31 p
Number of pages: 31

Edition Identifiers

Open Library: OL15028365M

Work Identifiers

Work ID: OL3872804W

Source records

Miami University of Ohio MARC record

Community Reviews (0)

No community reviews have been submitted for this work.

Lists

Download catalog record: RDF / JSON / OPDS | Wikipedia citation

An argument proving that the abrogation of King James by the people of England from the regal throne, and the promotion of the Prince of Orange, one of the royal family, to the throne of the kingdom in his stead, was according to the constitution of the English government, and prescribed by it

in opposition to all the false and treacherous hypotheses, of usurpation, conquest, desertion, and of taking the powers that are upon content

by Samuel Johnson (pamphleteer)