Check nearby libraries
Buy this book
![Loading indicator](/images/ajax-loader-bar.gif)
In his new study of the American judicial system Sterling Harwood, J.D., Professor of Philosophy at San Jose State University, scrutinizes the particular legal, moral and philosophical claims about judicial activism.
This study explores the various arguments in favor and against activism offered in leading theories, including treatment of the democratic framework of courts, of the importance of predecent or stare decisis in judicial decision, and of the justification of activism by procedural due process. Reconsidering these same criticisms passivists make about activism, Harwood builds a tightly-argued case in favor of activism.
Complemented with tables of judges (including John Austin) and judicial decisions, Judicial Activism is a work rich in thought-provoking arguments that concern not only judges, but the entire legal and political community as well.
Check nearby libraries
Buy this book
![Loading indicator](/images/ajax-loader-bar.gif)
Places
United StatesShowing 1 featured edition. View all 1 editions?
Edition | Availability |
---|---|
1 |
aaaa
Libraries near you:
WorldCat
|
Book Details
Edition Notes
Includes bibliographical references and indexes.
Classifications
The Physical Object
ID Numbers
Community Reviews (0)
Feedback?History
- Created April 1, 2008
- 7 revisions
Wikipedia citation
×CloseCopy and paste this code into your Wikipedia page. Need help?
August 6, 2024 | Edited by MARC Bot | import existing book |
July 17, 2023 | Edited by ImportBot | import existing book |
July 17, 2023 | Edited by ImportBot | import existing book |
November 16, 2020 | Edited by MARC Bot | import existing book |
April 1, 2008 | Created by an anonymous user | Imported from Scriblio MARC record |