Political partisanship in the American middle colonies, 1700-1776

  • 0 Ratings
  • 0 Want to read
  • 0 Currently reading
  • 0 Have read

My Reading Lists:

Create a new list

Check-In

×Close
Add an optional check-in date. Check-in dates are used to track yearly reading goals.
Today

  • 0 Ratings
  • 0 Want to read
  • 0 Currently reading
  • 0 Have read

Buy this book

Last edited by MARC Bot
July 17, 2024 | History

Political partisanship in the American middle colonies, 1700-1776

  • 0 Ratings
  • 0 Want to read
  • 0 Currently reading
  • 0 Have read

In this impressive study of the origins of the American party system, Benjamin H. Newcomb applies the "new" political history - especially quantitative methodology - to political activity in the colonies of New York, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania from 1700 to the beginning of the Revolution.

Close analysis of a great array of sources leads him to conclude that political partisanship was much stronger, more extensive, and more enduring in the middle fifty years of the eighteenth century than historians have heretofore believed.

Newcomb supports his case primarily through exploration of statistical data derived from legislative roll-call votes, biographical information on legislators, censuses, poll lists, wills, and other public documents. He clearly presents the quantitative information in a series of thirty-four brief tables throughout the text, and he explains the details of his methods in three appendixes.

He finds that middle-colony politics was not conducted by factions or by a few oligarchs dominating a deferential electorate, but by real parties that were forerunners of, and shared many attributes with, nineteenth-century mass political parties.

Publish Date
Language
English
Pages
258

Buy this book

Previews available in: English

Edition Availability
Cover of: Political partisanship in the American middle colonies, 1700-1776
Political partisanship in the American middle colonies, 1700-1776
1995, Louisiana State University Press
Hardcover in English

Add another edition?

Book Details


Table of Contents

Introduction
From factionalism to partisanship, 1700-1737
The determinants of paartisanship
The first partisan alignment, 1737-1753
The partisan system in wartime, 1754-1764
Partisanship in imperial crisis, 1765-1773
Parties and the revolution, 1774-1776
Conclusion
Appendixes. Analysis of roll call voting
Analysis of participation of assemblymen
Voter participation and partisanship
Bibliography of secondary sources

Edition Notes

Includes bibliographical references (p. [235]-250) and index.

Published in
Baton Rouge

Classifications

Dewey Decimal Class
320.973/09/033
Library of Congress
E195 .N493 1995, E195.N493 1995

The Physical Object

Format
Hardcover
Pagination
xiv, 258 p.
Number of pages
258
Dimensions
24 x x centimeters

ID Numbers

Open Library
OL1113835M
Internet Archive
politicalpartisa0000newc
ISBN 10
0807118753
ISBN 13
9780807118757
LCCN
94039764
OCLC/WorldCat
31409199
Library Thing
549601
Goodreads
3870111

Work Description

In this impressive study of the origins of the American party system, Benjamin H. Newcomb applies the "new" political history -- especially quantitative methodology -- to political activity in the colonies of New York, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania from 1700 to the beginning of the Revolution. Close analysis of a great array of sources leads him to conclude that political partisanship was much stronger, more extensive, and more enduring in the middle fifty years of the eighteenth century than historians have heretofore believed. Newcomb supports his case primarily through exploration of statistical data derived from legislative roll-call votes, biographical information on legislators, censuses, poll lists, wills, and other public documents. He clearly presents the quantitative information in a series of thirty-four brief tables throughout the text, and he explains the details of his methods in three appendixes. He finds that middle-colony politics was not conducted by factions or by a few oligarchs dominating a deferential electorate, but by real parties that were forerunners of, and shared many attributes with, nineteenth-century mass political parties. - Jacket flap.

Community Reviews (0)

Feedback?
No community reviews have been submitted for this work.

History

Download catalog record: RDF / JSON / OPDS | Wikipedia citation
July 17, 2024 Edited by MARC Bot import existing book
November 18, 2020 Edited by MARC Bot import existing book
October 12, 2020 Edited by ImportBot import existing book
August 14, 2020 Edited by ImportBot import existing book
April 1, 2008 Created by an anonymous user Imported from Scriblio MARC record