Good Governance in Microcredit Strategy for Poverty Reduction: Focus on Western Mindanao, Philippines

no
Good Governance in Microcredit Strategy for P ...
Locate

My Reading Lists:

Create a new list


Buy this book

Last edited by Frede G. Moreno
January 19, 2012 | History

Good Governance in Microcredit Strategy for Poverty Reduction: Focus on Western Mindanao, Philippines

no

This work doesn't have a description yet. Can you add one?

Publish Date

Buy this book

Book Details


Table of Contents

I. INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
A. Background of the Study . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
B. Situational Analysis: The Western Mindanao
Community Initiatives Project (WMCIP) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
C. Statement of the Problem . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
D. The Research Objectives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
E. Significance of the Study . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
F. Scope and Limitation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
II. REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE AND CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
A. Review of Related Literature . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
A.1. Global Movement for Poverty Reduction through
Microcredit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
A.2. Microcredit as a Mechanism to Reduce Poverty . . . . . . . 31
A.3. Controversies and Current Debates in Microcredit . . . . . . 34
A.4. Microcredit for Poverty Alleviation: A Critique . . . . . . . . 42
A.5. Microcredit as an Instrument of Governance . . . . . . . . . 46
A.6. Successful Microcredit Models . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60
A.7. Implementation Strategies of Successful
Microcredit Models . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62
A.7.a. The Grameen Credit-Only Strategy
(minimalist approach) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63
A.7.b. Bangladesh Rural Advancement Committee (BRAC):
A Graduated Process for Helping the Poorest . . . . . 66
A.7.c. Bank Rakyat Indonesia’s (BRI) Character
References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70
A.7.d. Association for Social Advancement (ASA)
and Compulsory Savings Scheme . . . . . . . . . . . 71
A.8. Microcredit for Poverty Alleviation: The Philippine
Experience . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77
A.9. Grameen Replication in the Philippines: Selected
Best Practices . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80
A.9.a. Cooperative Rural Bank of Laguna, Inc. (CRBLI) . . 81
A.9.b. Center for Agriculture and Rural Development
(CARD) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82
A.9.c. Tulay Sa Pag-Unlad Inc. (TSPI) . . . . . . . . . . . . 85
A.9.d. Negros Women for Tomorrow Foundation, Inc.-
Project Dungganon (NWFTFI) . . . . . . . . . . . . 86
A.10. The National Government’s Performance as a Banker
for the Poor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 93
A.11. The National Strategy for Microfinance . . . . . . . . . . . . 96
A.12. Microfinance Rhetoric in the General Banking Law . . . . . 100
A.13. The Factors Affecting Microcredit Programs . . . . . . . . . 101
A.13.a. Household Financial Conditions . . . . . . . . . . . 104
A.13.b. Credit Needs of the Poor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 107
A.13.c. Credit Experience . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 109
A.13.c.1. Access to Loans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 112
A.13.c.2. Loan Utilization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 113
A.13.c.3. Loan Repayment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 115
A.13.d. Credit Providers for the Poor . . . . . . . . . . . . . 117
A.13.e. Microcredit Preferences and Demand . . . . . . . . 120
A.13.f. Good Governance as Microcredit Strategies . . . . 125
A.13.f.1. Participation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 128
A.13.f.2. Transparency . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 131
A.13.f.3. Accountability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 132
A.13.f.4. Sustainability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 136
B. The Conceptual Framework . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 143
C. Operational Definition of Variables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 154
III. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 160
A. Research Technique . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 160
B. Difficulties Encountered . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 166
C. Population and Sampling . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 167
D. Data Analysis and Interpretation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 171
IV. PRESENTATION AND INTERPRETATION OF FINDINGS
AND OBSERVATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 176
A. Credit Options for WMCIP Beneficiaries . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 176 a.1. Credit Option #1: LBP Assistance to Cooperatives . . . . . . . 178 a.2. Credit Option #2: Credit Assistance Program for
Program Beneficiaries Development (CAP-PBD) . . . . . . . 188 a.3. Credit Option #3: PCFC’s Credit Program for
Grameen Bank Approach Replication (GBAR) . . . . . . . . 193 a.4 Credit Option #4. QUEDANCOR’s Microcredit
Program (Grameen Replication) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 197 a.5. Summary of Findings: Credit Program Designs . . . . . . . . . 201
B. Limiting and Enabling Factors in Microcredit Program . . . . . . . . 214 b.1. Demographic Attributes of the Respondents . . . . . . . . . . . 215 b.1.a. Gender . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .216 b.1.b. Age . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 216
b.1.c. Ethnicity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 217 b.1.d. Religion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 219 b.1.e. Household Role . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . 220 b.1.f. Number of Children . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 221 b.1.g. Summary of Findings: Demographic Attributes .. . . . . 222
b.2. Household Financial Conditions . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . 226 b.2.a. Type of House . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 228 b.2.b. Main Source of Income . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . 229 b.2.c. Other Sources of Income for the Family . . . . . . . . . 231 b.2.d. Estimated Average Monthly Income . . . . . . . . . . . 234 b.2.e. Average Monthly Expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 239 b.2.f. Household Cash Flow . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 242 b.2.g. Actions Toward Savings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 245 b.2.h. Actions Toward Cash Shortages . . . . . . . . . . . . . 247 b.2.i. Summary of Findings: Household Financial Conditions 249 b.2.j. The Appropriateness of Microcredit Program
based on Household Financial Conditions . . . . . . . . 256 b.3. Credit Experience . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 264 b.3.a. Credit Experience in the Last Two Years . . . . . . . 266
b.3.b. Credit Needs: Overspending Situations . . . . . . . . . 260 b.3.c. Creditor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 262 b.3.d. Access to Loan and Other Credit Services . . . . . . . . 270 b.3.e. Uses of Amount Borrowed . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 272 b.3.f. Interest Rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 273 b.3.g. Mode of Payment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 274 b.3.h. Loan Utilization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 276 b.3.i. Repayment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 277 b.3.j. Summary of Findings: Credit Experience . . . . . . . . 280
b.4. Microcredit Preferences and Demand . . . . . . . . . . . . . .288 b.4.a. Income-Generating Activities for Financing . . . . . . . 291 b.4.b. Loan size . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 292 b.4.c. Collateral . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 294 b.4.d. Public Support Services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 296 b.4.e. Summary of Findings: Microcredit Preferences
and Demand . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 301 b.4.f. Appropriateness of Credit Program Design to
Credit Needs, Preferences and Demand . . . . . . . . . 303 b.5. Summary of Findings: Enabling and Limiting Factors . . . . . 307
C. Good Governance in Pro-poor Microcredit Strategies . . . . . . . . 314 c.1. Participation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 317 c.2. Transparency . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 321 c.3. Accountability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 325
c.4. Sustainability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 331 c.5. Summary of Findings: Good Governance in Pro-poor
Microcredit Strategies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 335
D. Good Governance Strategies in Microcredit Program
for Poverty Reduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 337 d.1. Beneficiary Perspectives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 337
d.2. Program Implementors’ Perspectives . . . . . . . . . . . . . 341
E. Summary of Findings and Observations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 348
V.
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.
. .
359
Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 359
Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 370
VI. LESSONS LEARNED AND RECOMMENDATIONS . . . . . . . 377
A. Lessons Learned . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 377
a.1. Productive Potential of Target Beneficiaries . . . . . . . . . . 378
a.2. Resources and Capabilities of Potential Governance
Partners . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 380
a.3. Natural Resource Endowments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 383
a.4. Direct Involvement of the National Government and
International Donors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 384
B. Recommendations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 391
1. Creation of Two Special Microcredit Windows . . . . . . . . . 395
A. CAP-PBD Application . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 396
B. QUEDANCOR Microcredit Window for
Self-Reliant Teams (SRTs) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 397
2. Creation of Special Poverty Alleviation Sub-component (SPAS) 398
3. Administration of Microcredit Program and Special Poverty
Alleviation Sub-component and Microcredit Program . . . . . . 401
A. Socio-Economic Parameters
(Poor and Non-Poor Beneficiaries) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 402
B. Operating Guidelines for Microcredit and SPAS . . . . . . 408
4. The Recommended Microcredit Goverance Model . . . . . . . 413
A. Participation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 414
B. Transparency . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 414
C. Accountability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 415
D. Sustainability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 419
5. Impact Assessment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 421
Bibliography . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 424
Appendix A Survey Questionnaire for Availers of Credit Services . . . . . . 433
Appendix B Survey Questionnaire for Non-Availers of Credit Services . . . . 442
Appendix C List of WMCIP-covered Barangays . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 449
Appendix D List of Sampled Barangays . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 451

Edition Notes

Published in
Quezon City, Philippines
Other Titles
no
Copyright Date
2004

Edition Identifiers

Open Library
OL25174663M

Work Identifiers

Work ID
OL16466228W

Community Reviews (0)

No community reviews have been submitted for this work.

Lists

History

Download catalog record: RDF / JSON
January 19, 2012 Edited by Frede G. Moreno Edited without comment.
January 19, 2012 Created by Frede G. Moreno Added new book.