MORAL REASONING IN MALE AND FEMALE NURSES: A CARE PERSPECTIVE VS. A JUSTICE PERSPECTIVE (ETHICS).

  • 1 Want to read
MORAL REASONING IN MALE AND FEMALE NURSES: A ...
Nancy Marie Murray, Nancy Mari ...
Locate

My Reading Lists:

Create a new list

  • 1 Want to read

Buy this book

Last edited by Open Library Bot
December 3, 2010 | History

MORAL REASONING IN MALE AND FEMALE NURSES: A CARE PERSPECTIVE VS. A JUSTICE PERSPECTIVE (ETHICS).

  • 1 Want to read

The continuing rapid expansion of the technoculture which is happening in today's American health care system, is a threat to human relationships. Accelerating health care costs, an aging population, homelessness, HIV/AIDS and other evolving disease phenomena, as well as substance abuse and associated catastrophic problems, are a sampling of the factors contributing to the debilitation of human relations. However, through nurses as caring practitioners, this threat to denigrate human connection can be diminished.

In a paternalistic society, despite recent significant improvements for women, there is a residual perception that caring is primarily a feminine trait of secondary importance. While the nursing profession is predominantly female and is socioculturally perceived as feminine, male nurses are represented in every nursing specialty, often in leadership roles. If both men and women practice nursing according to the required level of high moral reasoning, do men and women employ similar reasoning patterns when forming ethical decisions?.

Previously, researchers explaining moral behavior in nurses have focused on Kohlberg's justice-oriented theory of moral development, yielding unsatisfactory results. Gilligan et al., as well as nurse scholars, have challenged the widely accepted views by Kohlberg and argue for an opposing orientation to moral reasoning identified as a care perspective.

In order to answer the question whether or not the moral reasoning perspectives chosen by nurses are gender specific or gender related, a convenience sample of five male and five female nurses responded to four practice-related moral dilemmas. The interviews were transcribed and the content analyzed to determine the choice of moral perspective, guided by a procedure developed by Lyons and modified for this qualitative study. Constructs of justice and care were validated by the researcher analyzing the literature and were used to develop a reading guide for moral perspective.

The researcher found that the choice of moral framework along gender lines was not apparent. The major finding is that male and female nurses know and represent both moral perspectives of care and justice in their attempts to resolve moral conflict.

Publish Date
Pages
144

Buy this book

Book Details


Edition Notes

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 57-02, Section: A, page: 0619.

Thesis (ED.D.)--RUTGERS THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY - NEW BRUNSWICK, 1995.

School code: 0190.

The Physical Object

Pagination
144 p.
Number of pages
144

Edition Identifiers

Open Library
OL17916228M

Work Identifiers

Work ID
OL12280940W

Community Reviews (0)

No community reviews have been submitted for this work.

Lists

History

Download catalog record: RDF / JSON
December 3, 2010 Edited by Open Library Bot Added subjects from MARC records.
January 23, 2010 Edited by WorkBot add more information to works
December 11, 2009 Created by WorkBot add works page