It looks like you're offline.
Open Library logo
additional options menu

MARC Record from marc_openlibraries_sanfranciscopubliclibrary

Record ID marc_openlibraries_sanfranciscopubliclibrary/sfpl_chq_2018_12_24_run04.mrc:266222400:3389
Source marc_openlibraries_sanfranciscopubliclibrary
Download Link /show-records/marc_openlibraries_sanfranciscopubliclibrary/sfpl_chq_2018_12_24_run04.mrc:266222400:3389?format=raw

LEADER: 03389cam a2200577 i 4500
001 ocn774021191
003 OCoLC
005 20151005101722.0
008 120113s2012 ilua b 001 0 eng c
010 $a2012001904
016 7 $a016135138$2Uk
020 $a9780226291079 (cloth : alkaline paper)
020 $a0226291073 (cloth : alkaline paper)
020 $a9780226291086 (paperback : alkaline paper)
020 $a0226291081 (paperback : alkaline paper)
035 $a(OCoLC)774021191
037 $bUniv of Chicago Pr, Attn: John Kessler C/O Chicago Distribution Center 11030 Langley Ave, Chicago, IL, USA, 60628$nSAN 202-5280
040 $aICU/DLC$erda$beng$cCGU$dDLC$dBTCTA$dYDXCP$dBDX$dUKMGB$dOCLCO$dCGU$dBWX$dCDX$dSFR$dUtOrBLW
042 $apcc
043 $an-us---
049 $aSFRA
050 00 $aKF8776$b.G538 2012
082 00 $a347.73/14$223
092 $a347.7314$bG3583e
100 1 $aGibson, James L.,$d1951-
245 10 $aElecting judges :$bthe surprising effects of campaigning on judicial legitimacy /$cJames L. Gibson.
260 $aChicago :$bUniversity of Chicago Press,$c2012.
300 $axi, 226 p. :$bill. ;$c23 cm.
336 $atext$btxt$2rdacontent
337 $aunmediated$bn$2rdamedia
338 $avolume$bnc$2rdacarrier
490 1 $aChicago studies in American politics
504 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
505 0 $aThe "new style" judicial elections in the American states -- Republican Party of Minnesota v. White and perceptions of judicial impartiality -- Can campaign activity cross the line? -- Diffuse support for a state supreme court: judicial legitimacy in Kentucky -- Expectancy theory and judicial legitimacy -- Judges, elections, and the American mass public: the effects of judicial campaigns on the legitimacy of courts -- Judicial campaigns, elections for judges, and court legitimacy: do judicial elections really stink? -- Appendix A: legal developments post-White -- Appendix B: the surveys -- Appendix C: experimental vignettes -- Appendix D: question wording -- Appendix E: the distributions of key analytical variables -- Appendix F: interactive analysis -- Appendix G: measuring support for democratic institutions and processes -- Appendix H: question wording -- Appendix I: adding control variables.
650 0 $aJudges$zUnited States$xElection.
650 0 $aJudicial ethics$zUnited States.
830 0 $aChicago studies in American politics.
907 $a.b25494430$b12-29-16$c08-24-12
998 $axgi$b10-17-12$cm$da $e-$feng$gilu$h0$i0
907 $a.b25494430$b11-19-12$c08-24-12
938 $aBaker and Taylor$bBTCP$nBK0011014956
938 $aBrodart$bBROD$n102907226$c$27.50
938 $aYBP Library Services$bYANK$n7583908
938 $aBlackwell Book Service$bBBUS$n7697790
938 $aCoutts Information Services$bCOUT$n20691746
980 $a1012 sh
998 $axgi$b10-17-12$cm$da$e-$feng$gilu$h0$i0
994 $aC0$bSFR
999 $yMARS
945 $a347.7314 G3583e$d - - $e01-04-2017 15:20$f0$g0$h04-01-17$i31223101707066$j141$0800$k - - $lxgici$nGIC Inventory 2016$o-$p$27.50$q-$r-$s- $t1$u1$v3$w0$x0$y.i71381909$z11-19-12
945 $a347.7314 G3583e$d - - $e03-05-2016 11:28$f0$g0$h03-26-16$i31223101707074$j503$0503$k - - $lxgici$nGIC Inventory 2016$o-$p$27.50$q-$r-$s- $t1$u1$v0$w0$x0$y.i71381910$z11-19-12