MARC Record from marc_oapen

LEADER: 02203 am a22003373u 450
001 1002602
005 20200107
007 cu#uuu---auuuu
008 200107s|||| xx o 0 u ger |
020 $a9783110550672
020 $a9783110548907
024 7 $a10.1515/9783110550672$2doi
041 0 $ager
042 $adc
072 7 $aCFA$2bicssc
072 7 $aDSA$2bicssc
072 7 $aHPCA$2bicssc
072 7 $aHPCF$2bicssc
100 1 $aKopperschmidt, Josef$4aut
245 10 $aWir sind nicht auf der Welt, um zu schweigen
260 $aBerlin, Germany$bDe Gruyter$c2018
300 $a393
520 $aWe are not in the world to mention is the title of a somewhat unconventional "introduction to rhetoric". It is not an introduction to its history or system, but exposes the specific question interest of rhetoric. Since antiquity, rhetoric has been asking for the conditions of convinced approval as the basis for survival cooperation. The notorious conflict of rhetoric with philosophy resulted from the different functionalization of this consent: Should it merely be condoned as a concession to the intellectual weakness of people in order to win them for the acceptance of truth claims (Plato), or must one in the convinced consent requirement rather see the actual reason for possible truthfulness (so the sophistry)? This conflict was only decided after Hans Blumenberg, when direct paths to the truth could no longer be philosophically promised seriously. As a result, the rhetorical principle of convinced approval could finally become philosophically an attractive validity principle under conditions of modernity. Therefore, if today something rhetoric makes current, then it is the modernity of this conviction or consent-dependent validity principle.

546 $aGerman.
650 7 $aPhilosophy of language$2bicssc
650 7 $aLiterary theory$2bicssc
650 7 $aWestern philosophy: Ancient, to c 500$2bicssc
650 7 $aWestern philosophy, from c 1900 -$2bicssc
653 $aRhetoric
856 40 $uhttp://www.oapen.org/download?type=document&docid=1002602$zAccess full text online
856 40 $uhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/$zCreative Commons License