| Record ID | marc_oapen/oapen.marc.utf8.mrc:14436476:1889 |
| Source | marc_oapen |
| Download Link | /show-records/marc_oapen/oapen.marc.utf8.mrc:14436476:1889?format=raw |
LEADER: 01889 am a22003133u 450
001 610172
005 20191126
007 cu#uuu---auuuu
008 191126s|||| xx o 0 u ger |
020 $a9783938616499
024 7 $a10.17875/gup2006-21$2doi
041 0 $ager
042 $adc
072 7 $aJFME$2bicssc
072 7 $aL$2bicssc
072 7 $aLNF$2bicssc
100 1 $aSchumann, Eva$4aut
245 10 $aDignitas - Voluntas - Vita - Überlegungen zur Sterbehilfe aus rechtshistorischer, interdisziplinärer und rechtsvergleichender Sicht Göttinger Antrittsvorlesung im Januar 2006
260 $a$bUniversitätsverlag Göttingen$c2006
520 $aContrary to the common constriction of the euthanasia-discussion on ?self-determination at the end of life" Eva Schumann claims rethinking in dealing with seriously ill and dying people. To meet their needs in her view a comprehensive access to outpatient and inpatient palliative care facilities is recquired and also improvements of care in nursing homes as well as offers to improve the integration of members into care. These claims conclude the discussion between assistance in dying (indirect euthanasia), and assistance to die (active and passive euthanasia). Taking account historical, interdisciplinary and comparative law issues it is demonstrated that the formal legal distinction between the various case groups of euthanasia not sufficiently takes into account the social dimension of dying.
546 $aGerman.
650 7 $aEthical issues: euthanasia & right to die$2bicssc
650 7 $aLaw$2bicssc
650 7 $aCriminal law & procedure$2bicssc
653 $alaw
653 $aeuthanasia
653 $ageriatric welfare
856 40 $uhttp://www.oapen.org/download?type=document&docid=610172$zAccess full text online
856 40 $uhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/2.0/de/deed.de$zCreative Commons License