MARC Record from marc_oapen

LEADER: 01927 am a22003133u 450
001 610220
005 20191126
007 cu#uuu---auuuu
008 191126s|||| xx o 0 u ger |
020 $a9783938616833
024 7 $a10.17875/gup2007-167$2doi
041 0 $ager
042 $adc
072 7 $aL$2bicssc
072 7 $aLNF$2bicssc
100 1 $aScheumer, Maike$4aut
245 10 $aVideovernehmung kindlicher Zeugen - zur Praxis des Zeugenschutzgesetzes
260 $a$bUniversitätsverlag Göttingen$c2007
520 $aThe author examines the practice of video interrogation for children witnesses. Starting point for their empirical investigation is the question of whether the law reform is not only meant well, but can be implemented practically. Here the author builds on the regulations of the 1998 established law for witness protection, to its feasibility in terms of the intended effective protection of victims, particularly the avoidance of so-called secondary victimization (trauma), experts from the federal state of Lower Saxony - prosecutors, police and courts - report by their own experiencees. In five selected district courts of Lower Saxony, the author has also conducted an extensive document analysis on the use of video testimony, and concluded that the video technology in criminal proceedings is used rarely. In specific reform proposals ?de lege ferenda? also the recent regulations of the Law Reform Act of 2003 victims are included in the evaluative study.
546 $aGerman.
650 7 $aLaw$2bicssc
650 7 $aCriminal law & procedure$2bicssc
653 $achildren witnesses
653 $avideo interrogation
653 $atrial
653 $awitness protection
653 $aLower Saxony
856 40 $uhttp://www.oapen.org/download?type=document&docid=610220$zAccess full text online
856 40 $uhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/deed.de$zCreative Commons License