Record ID | marc_loc_updates/v40.i17.records.utf8:10042675:2223 |
Source | Library of Congress |
Download Link | /show-records/marc_loc_updates/v40.i17.records.utf8:10042675:2223?format=raw |
LEADER: 02223nam a2200337 a 4500
001 2011378004
003 DLC
005 20120418092659.0
008 110504s2010 onca b 001 0deng d
010 $a 2011378004
016 $a20109044770
020 $a9781442640931
020 $a1442640936
035 $a(OCoLC)ocn642846588
040 $aNLC$beng$cNLC$dBTCTA$dYDXCP$dERASA$dCDX$dBWX$dTXA$dFDA$dLHU$dDLC
042 $alccopycat
050 00 $aPN171.P83$bL36 2010
082 04 $a801/.92$222
100 1 $aLancashire, Ian.
245 10 $aForgetful muses :$breading the author in the text /$cIan Lancashire.
260 $aToronto ;$aBuffalo, N.Y. :$bUniversity of Toronto Press,$cc2010.
300 $axii, 339 p. :$bill. ;$c24 cm.
504 $aIncludes bibliographical references (p. [287]-316) and index.
505 0 $aIntroduction : finding the author in the text -- Experiencing the muse -- Uttering -- Cybertextuality -- Poet-authors -- Novelist-authors -- Reading the writer's own anonymous.
520 $a"How can we understand and analyze the primarily unconscious process of writing? In this groundbreaking work of neuro-cognitive literary theory, Ian Lancashire maps the interplay of self-conscious critique and unconscious creativity.
520 $aForgetful Muses shows how a writer's own 'anonymous,' that part of the mind that creates language up to the point of consciousness, is the genesis of thought. Those thoughts are then articulated by an author's inner voice and become subject to critique by the mind's 'reader-editor.' The 'reader-editor' engages with the 'anonymous,' which uses this information to formulate new ideas. Drawing on author testimony, cybernetics, cognitive psychology, corpus linguistics, text analysis, the neurobiology of mental aging, and his own experiences, Lancashire's close readings of twelve authors, including Caedmon, Chaucer, Coleridge, Joyce, Christie, and Atwood, serve to illuminate a mystery we all share."--BOOK JACKET.
650 0 $aAuthorship$xPsychological aspects.
650 0 $aStyle, Literary.
650 0 $aCreation (Literary, artistic, etc.)$xPsychological aspects.
650 0 $aCriticism$xPsychological aspects.
650 0 $aPsychology and literature.