It looks like you're offline.
Open Library logo
additional options menu
⚠ Urge publishers to restore access to 500,000 removed library books: Sign Letter - Learn More

MARC Record from Library of Congress

Record ID marc_loc_2016/BooksAll.2016.part39.utf8:173127637:2212
Source Library of Congress
Download Link /show-records/marc_loc_2016/BooksAll.2016.part39.utf8:173127637:2212?format=raw

LEADER: 02212cam a2200373 i 4500
001 2012001904
003 DLC
005 20121103081824.0
008 120113s2012 ilua b 001 0 eng c
010 $a 2012001904
020 $a9780226291079 (cloth : alk. paper)
020 $a0226291073 (cloth : alk. paper)
020 $a9780226291086 (paperback : alk. paper)
020 $a0226291081 (paperback : alk. paper)
020 $z9780226291109 (e-book)
020 $z0226291103 (e-book)
040 $aICU/DLC$beng$cICU$erda$dDLC
042 $apcc
043 $an-us---
050 00 $aKF8776$b.G538 2012
082 00 $a347.73/14$223
100 1 $aGibson, James L.,$d1951-
245 10 $aElecting judges :$bthe surprising effects of campaigning on judicial legitimacy /$cJames L. Gibson.
264 1 $aChicago ;$aLondon :$bUniversity of Chicago Press,$c2012.
300 $axi, 226 pages :$billustrations ;$c24 cm.
336 $atext$2rdacontent
337 $aunmediated$2rdamedia
338 $avolume$2rdacarrier
490 1 $aChicago studies in American politics
504 $aIncludes bibliographical references (pages 207-218) and index.
505 0 $aThe "new style" judicial elections in the American states -- Republican Party of Minnesota v. White and perceptions of judicial impartiality -- Can campaign activity cross the line? -- Diffuse support for a state supreme court: judicial legitimacy in Kentucky -- Expectancy theory and judicial legitimacy -- Judges, elections, and the American mass public: the effects of judicial campaigns on the legitimacy of courts -- Judicial campaigns, elections for judges, and court legitimacy: do judicial elections really stink? -- Appendix A: legal developments post-White -- Appendix B: the surveys -- Appendix C: experimental vignettes -- Appendix D: question wording -- Appendix E: the distributions of key analytical variables -- Appendix F: interactive analysis -- Appendix G: measuring support for democratic institutions and processes -- Appendix H: question wording -- Appendix I: adding control variables.
650 0 $aJudges$zUnited States$xElection.
650 0 $aJudicial ethics$zUnited States.
830 0 $aChicago studies in American politics.