MARC Record from Library of Congress

LEADER: 03751cam a22003734a 4500
001 2010029822
003 DLC
005 20130717075638.0
008 100715s2011 nyu b 001 0 eng c
010 $a 2010029822
016 7 $a015772645$2Uk
020 $a9780801446047 (cloth : alk. paper)
020 $a080144604X (cloth : alk. paper)
020 $a9780801477263
020 $a0801477263
035 $a(OCoLC)ocn649927341
040 $aNIC/DLC$cDLC$dYDX$dYDXCP$dCOO$dYHM$dBTCTA$dCDX$dBWX$dDEBBG$dUKMGB$dI8H$dMIX$dDLC
042 $apcc
043 $an-us---
050 00 $aE840$b.L38 2011
082 00 $a327.73009/04$222
100 1 $aLatham, Michael E.
245 14 $aThe right kind of revolution :$bmodernization, development, and U.S. foreign policy from the Cold War to the present /$cMichael E. Latham.
260 $aIthaca :$bCornell University Press,$c2011.
300 $aix, 246 p. ;$c24 cm.
490 1 $aCornell paperbacks
504 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
505 0 $aSetting the foundations : imperial ideals, global war, and decolonization -- Take-off : modernization and Cold War America -- Nationalist encounters : Nehru's India, Nasser's Egypt, and Nkrumah's Ghana -- Technocratic faith : from birth control to the green revolution -- Counterinsurgency and repression : Guatemala, South Vietnam, and Iran -- Modernization under fire : alternative paradigms, sustainable development, and the neoliberal turn -- The ghosts of modernization : from Cold War victory to Afghanistan and Iraq.
520 $aAfter World War II, a powerful conviction took hold among American intellectuals and policymakers: that the United States could profoundly accelerate and ultimately direct the development of the decolonizing world, serving as a modernizing force around the globe. By accelerating economic growth, promoting agricultural expansion, and encouraging the rise of enlightened elites, they hoped to link development with security, preventing revolutions and rapidly creating liberal, capitalist states. In The Right Kind of Revolution, Michael E. Latham explores the role of modernization and development in U.S. foreign policy from the early Cold War through the present. The modernization project rarely went as its architects anticipated. Nationalist leaders in postcolonial states such as India, Ghana, and Egypt pursued their own independent visions of development. Attempts to promote technological solutions to development problems also created unintended consequences by increasing inequality, damaging the environment, and supporting coercive social policies. In countries such as Guatemala, South Vietnam, and Iran, U.S. officials and policymakers turned to modernization as a means of counterinsurgency and control, ultimately shoring up dictatorial regimes and exacerbating the very revolutionary dangers they wished to resolve. Those failures contributed to a growing challenge to modernization theory in the late 1960s and 1970s. Since the end of the Cold War the faith in modernization as a panacea has reemerged. The idea of a global New Deal, however, has been replaced by a neoliberal emphasis on the power of markets to shape developing nations in benevolent ways. U.S. policymakers have continued to insist that history has a clear, universal direction, but events in Iraq and Afghanistan give the lie to modernization's false hopes and appealing promises.
651 0 $aUnited States$xForeign relations$y1945-1989.
651 0 $aUnited States$xForeign relations$y1989-
648 7 $aGeschichte 1945-2011.$2swd
776 08 $iOnline version:$aLatham, Michael E.$tRight kind of revolution.$dIthaca : Cornell University Press, 2011$w(OCoLC)757127450
830 0 $aCornell paperbacks.