MARC Record from marc_columbia

LEADER: 06298cam a2200577Ii 4500
001 14567741
005 20200402220231.0
008 191005t20192019dcua b 000 0 eng d
010 $a 2019946492
035 $a(OCoLC)1146059400
035 $a(OCoLC)on1146059400
035 $a(NNC)14567741
040 $aYDX$beng$erda$cYDX$dEEM$dOCLCF$dYDXIT$dOCLCQ$dEAU$dDLC
020 $a9780309486163$q(paperback)
020 $a0309486165$q(paperback)
020 $z9780309486170 (eBook)
020 $z0309486173 (eBook)
043 $an-us---
050 4 $aQ180.A1$bC66 2019
082 04 $a507.2$223
049 $aZCUA
110 2 $aNational Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (U.S.).$bCommittee on Reproducibility and Replicability in Science,$eauthor.
245 10 $aReproducibility and replicability in science /$cCommittee on Reproducibility and Replicability in Science, Board on Behavioral, Cognitive, and Sensory Sciences, Committee on National Statistics, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education ; Nuclear and Radiation Studies Board, Division on Earth and Life Studies ; Board on Mathematical Sciences and Analytics, Committee on Applied and Theoretical Statistics, Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences ; Board on Research Data and Information, Committee on Science, Engineering, Medicine, and Public Policy, Policy and Global Affairs.
264 1 $aWashington, DC :$bNational Academies Press,$c[2019]
264 4 $c©2019
300 $axxi, 234 pages :$billustrations (some color) ;$c23 cm.
336 $atext$btxt$2rdacontent
337 $aunmediated$bn$2rdamedia
338 $avolume$bnc$2rdacarrier
490 1 $aA consensus study report of the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, Medicine
504 $aIncludes bibliographical references (pages 163-168).
505 0 $aIntroduction -- Scientific methods and knowledge -- Understanding reproducibility and replicability -- Reproducibility -- Replicability -- Improving reproducibility and replicability -- Confidence in science -- References -- Appendixes
520 $a"One of the pathways by which the scientific community confirms the validity of a new scientific discovery is by repeating the research that produced it. When a scientific effort fails to independently confirm the computations or results of a previous study, some fear that it may be a symptom of a lack of rigor in science, while others argue that such an observed inconsistency can be an important precursor to new discovery. Concerns about reproducibility and replicability have been expressed in both scientific and popular media. As these concerns came to light, Congress requested that the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine conduct a study to assess the extent of issues related to reproducibility and replicability and to offer recommendations for improving rigor and transparency in scientific research. Reproducibility and Replicability in Science defines reproducibility and replicability and examines the factors that may lead to non-reproducibility and non-replicability in research. Unlike the typical expectation of reproducibility between two computations, expectations about replicability are more nuanced, and in some cases a lack of replicability can aid the process of scientific discovery. This report provides recommendations to researchers, academic institutions, journals, and funders on steps they can take to improve reproducibility and replicability in science"--Publisher's description
520 $a"One of the pathways by which the scientific community confirms the validity of a new scientific discovery is by repeating the research that produced it. When a scientific effort fails to independently confirm the computations or results of a previous study, some fear that it may be a symptom of a lack of rigor in science, while others argue that such an observed inconsistency can be an important precursor to new discovery. Concerns about reproducibility and replicability have been expressed in both scientific and popular media. As these concerns came to light, Congress requested that the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine conduct a study to assess the extent of issues related to reproducibility and replicability and to offer recommendations for improving rigor and transparency in scientific research. Reproducibility and Replicability in Science defines reproducibility and replicability and examines the factors that may lead to non-reproducibility and non-replicability in research. Unlike the typical expectation of reproducibility between two computations, expectations about replicability are more nuanced, and in some cases a lack of replicability can aid the process of scientific discovery. This report provides recommendations to researchers, academic institutions, journals, and funders on steps they can take to improve reproducibility and replicability in science"--Publisher's description
650 0 $aReproducible research$zUnited States.
650 0 $aScience$zUnited States$xMethodology.
650 0 $aScience$zUnited States$xExperiments.
650 7 $aReproducible research.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst01904473
650 7 $aScience$xExperiments.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst01108230
650 7 $aScience$xMethodology.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst01108313
651 7 $aUnited States.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst01204155
655 4 $aElectronic books.
710 2 $aNational Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (U.S.).$bNuclear and Radiation Studies Board,$eauthor.
710 2 $aNational Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (U.S.).$bBoard on Research Data and Information,$eauthor.
710 2 $aNational Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (U.S.).$bBoard on Mathematical Sciences and Analytics,$eauthor.
830 0 $aConsensus study report.
856 40 $3National Academies Press$uhttps://doi.org/10.17226/25303
856 40 $3ProQuest Ebook Central$uhttps://public.ebookcentral.proquest.com/choice/publicfullrecord.aspx?p=5905041
856 40 $3EBSCOhost$uhttp://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=2285524
856 40 $uhttp://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=none&isbn=9780309486194
852 00 $bsci$hQ180.A1$iN375 2019g