MARC Record from marc_columbia

LEADER: 03776cam a2200601 i 4500
001 14616751
005 20200221151826.0
008 171109s2018 nyu b 001 0 eng
010 $a 2017054213
035 $a(OCoLC)on1006617222
040 $aDLC$beng$erda$cDLC$dOCLCF$dOCLCO$dYDX$dOCLCO$dCZA$dGUB$dGZL$dTXQ$dVP@$dCLU$dXFG$dNZAUC$dZHB$dOCLCQ$dHEV$dRIU$dOCLCQ$dEUQ$dUKMGB$dWHCCD$dCGN$dOCLCQ$dOMB
015 $aGBB8B9521$2bnb
016 7 $a018921296$2Uk
020 $a9780190859121$q(hardcover)
020 $a0190859121$q(hardcover)
020 $z9780190859138$q(electronic book)
020 $z019085913X$q(electronic book)
020 $z9780190859145$q(electronic book)
020 $z0190859148$q(electronic book)
029 1 $aAU@$b000061196687
029 1 $aNLGGC$b419100652
029 1 $aUKMGB$b018921296
035 $a(OCoLC)1006617222
042 $apcc
043 $an-us---
050 00 $aKF9345$b.S77 2018
082 00 $a342.7308/53$223
084 $aLAW018000$aLAW109000$aLAW094000$2bisacsh
049 $aZCUA
100 1 $aStrossen, Nadine,$eauthor.
245 10 $aHate :$bwhy we should resist it with free speech, not censorship /$cNadine Strossen.
264 1 $aNew York, NY :$bOxford University Press,$c[2018]
300 $axxv, 199 pages ;$c22 cm
336 $atext$btxt$2rdacontent
337 $aunmediated$bn$2rdamedia
338 $avolume$bnc$2rdacarrier
490 1 $aInalienable rights series
500 $aIncludes index.
505 0 $aIntroduction -- Overview -- "Hate speech" laws violate fundamental free speech and equality principles -- When "hate speech" is protected and when it is punishable -- Because of their intractable vagueness and overbreadth, "hate speech" laws undermine free speech and equality -- Is it possible to draft a "hate speech" law that is not unduly vague or overbroad? -- Does constitutionally protected "hate speech" actually cause the feared harms? -- "Hate speech" laws are at best ineffective and at worst counterproductive -- Non-censorial methods effectively curb the potential harms of constitutionally protected "hate speech" -- Conclusion : Looking back, and forward.
520 $a"We live in an era in which offensive speech is on the rise. The emergence of the alt-right alone has fueled a marked increase in racist and anti-Semitic speech. Given its potential for harm, should this speech be banned? Nadine Strossen's HATE dispels the many misunderstandings that have clouded the perpetual debates about "hate speech vs. free speech." She argues that an expansive approach to the First Amendment is most effective at promoting democracy, equality, and societal harmony ..."--Publisher information.
520 $a"Dispelling rampant confusion about "hate speech," this book explains how U.S. law appropriately distinguishes between punishable and protected discriminatory speech. It shows that more speech-restrictive laws consistently have suppressed vital expression about public issues, targeting minority viewpoints and speakers; and that "counterspeech" has more effectively promoted equality and societal harmony."--Publisher information.
504 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
650 0 $aHate speech$xLaw and legislation$zUnited States.
650 0 $aFreedom of speech$zUnited States.
650 1 $aFreedom of speech$zUnited States.
650 7 $aLAW$xConstitutional.$2bisacsh
650 7 $aLAW$xGovernment$xGeneral.$2bisacsh
650 7 $aLAW$xDiscrimination.$2bisacsh
650 7 $aFreedom of speech.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst00934044
650 7 $aHate speech$xLaw and legislation.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst01909650
651 7 $aUnited States.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst01204155
830 0 $aInalienable rights series.
852 00 $bbar$hKF9345$i.S77 2018