Record ID | marc_columbia/Columbia-extract-20221130-030.mrc:140097967:3585 |
Source | marc_columbia |
Download Link | /show-records/marc_columbia/Columbia-extract-20221130-030.mrc:140097967:3585?format=raw |
LEADER: 03585cam a2200685 i 4500
001 14759686
005 20220403001658.0
006 m o d
007 cr cnu|||unuuu
008 190805s2019 enk go 000 0 eng d
035 $a(OCoLC)on1111577618
035 $a(NNC)14759686
040 $aTYFRS$beng$erda$epn$cTYFRS$dYDX$dEBLCP$dTYFRS$dUKAHL$dOCLCF$dOCLCQ$dK6U$dOCLCO$dOCLCQ$dOCLCO
019 $a1111711048$a1111975018
020 $a9780429319952$q(electronic bk.)
020 $a0429319959$q(electronic bk.)
020 $a9781000264937$q(electronic bk. ;$qMobipocket)
020 $a1000264939$q(electronic bk. ;$qMobipocket)
020 $a9781000300871$q(electronic bk. ;$qEPUB)
020 $a1000300870$q(electronic bk. ;$qEPUB)
020 $a9781000228991$q(electronic bk. ;$qPDF)
020 $a1000228991$q(electronic bk. ;$qPDF)
020 $z9780367334628
020 $z9780367334642
035 $a(OCoLC)1111577618$z(OCoLC)1111711048$z(OCoLC)1111975018
037 $a9780429319952$bTaylor & Francis
050 4 $aB2599.T78
072 7 $aPHI$x000000$2bisacsh
072 7 $aHP$2bicssc
082 04 $a121/.092$223
049 $aZCUA
100 1 $aWilson, Margaret Dauler,$d1939-1998,$eauthor.
245 10 $aLeibniz' doctrine of necessary truth /$cMargaret Dauler Wilson.
250 $aFirst edition.
264 1 $aLondon :$bRoutledge,$c2019.
300 $a1 online resource (iv, 148 pages)
336 $atext$btxt$2rdacontent
337 $acomputer$bc$2rdamedia
338 $aonline resource$bcr$2rdacarrier
490 0 $aRoutledge Library Editions: 17th Century Philosophy
505 0 $aPreface. Introduction 1. Leibniz' Doctrine and Some Historical Antecedents 2. Seventeenth Century Opposition: The Intuitionism of Descartes and Locke 3. Some Critical Challenges to Leibniz' Doctrine of Necessity 4. Leibniz' Opposition to Conventionalism and His Conception of Definition. Conclusion
520 $aOriginally published in 1990. This study was first written in 1965 when interest in Leibniz was intensifying. The book looks in detail at the doctrine of necessity - that necessary truths are those derivable from the principle of identity by the substitution of definitions. It first considers views of philosophic predecessors, relating Leibniz' doctrine to Aristotle and Hobbes among others. The second section examines the conflict between his reductionistic and formalistic views and the opposing intuitionism and anti-reductionism of Descartes and Locke. The author critically examines the theory of necessity, including Leibniz's arguments against the views of Hobbes and Locke, concluding with distinctions between necessary and contingent truths.
588 0 $aVendor-supplied metadata.
600 10 $aLeibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm,$cFreiherr von,$d1646-1716.
600 17 $aLeibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm,$cFreiherr von,$d1646-1716.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst00039580
650 0 $aNecessity (Philosophy)
650 0 $aTruth.
650 6 $aNécessité (Philosophie)
650 6 $aVérité.
650 7 $atruth.$2aat
650 7 $aPHILOSOPHY$xGeneral.$2bisacsh
650 7 $aNecessity (Philosophy)$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst01035337
650 7 $aTruth.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst01158235
655 2 $aAcademic Dissertation
655 4 $aElectronic books.
655 7 $aAcademic theses.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst01726453
655 7 $aAcademic theses.$2lcgft
655 7 $aThèses et écrits académiques.$2rvmgf
856 40 $uhttp://www.columbia.edu/cgi-bin/cul/resolve?clio14759686$zTaylor & Francis eBooks
852 8 $blweb$hEBOOKS