| Record ID | marc_columbia/Columbia-extract-20221130-028.mrc:122547617:1952 |
| Source | marc_columbia |
| Download Link | /show-records/marc_columbia/Columbia-extract-20221130-028.mrc:122547617:1952?format=raw |
LEADER: 01952cam a2200373 i 4500
001 13719137
005 20190310102916.0
008 180912s2019 inu b 001 0 eng
010 $a 2018043824
020 $a9780268104290$qhardcover$qalkaline paper
020 $a0268104298$qhardcover$qalkaline paper
024 $a40028777606
035 $a(OCoLC)on1057241577
035 $a(OCoLC)1057241577
035 $a(NNC)13719137
040 $aDLC$beng$erda$cDLC$dOCLCO$dOCLCF$dISS$dYDX
042 $apcc
050 00 $aJC574$b.M568 2019
082 00 $a320.51$223
100 1 $aMitchell, Mark T.,$eauthor.
245 14 $aThe limits of liberalism :$btradition, individualism, and the crisis of freedom /$cMark T. Mitchell.
264 1 $aNotre Dame, Indiana :$bUniversity of Notre Dame Press,$c[2019]
300 $axi, 327pages ;$c24 cm
336 $atext$btxt$2rdacontent
337 $aunmediated$bn$2rdamedia
338 $avolume$bnc$2rdacarrier
504 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
505 0 $aPreface -- Acknowledgments -- Introduction: surveying the landscape and defining terms -- The seventeenth-century denigration of tradition and a nineteenth-century response -- Michael oakeshott and the epistemic role of tradition -- Alasdair macintyre's tradition-constituted inquiry -- Michael polanyi and role of tacit knowledge -- The incoherence of liberalism and the response of tradition -- Afterword: a conservatism worth conserving, or conservatism as stewardship -- Notes -- Bibliography -- Index.
650 0 $aLiberalism$xPhilosophy.
650 0 $aPolitical science$xPhilosophy.
650 7 $aLiberalism$xPhilosophy.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst00997189
650 7 $aPolitical science$xPhilosophy.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst01069819
776 08 $iOnline version:$aMitchell, Mark T., author.$tLimits of liberalism$dNotre Dame : University of Notre Dame Press, [2018]$z9780268104313$w(DLC) 2018048894
852 00 $bleh$hJC574$i.M568 2019