It looks like you're offline.
Open Library logo
additional options menu

MARC Record from marc_columbia

Record ID marc_columbia/Columbia-extract-20221130-022.mrc:19155702:3553
Source marc_columbia
Download Link /show-records/marc_columbia/Columbia-extract-20221130-022.mrc:19155702:3553?format=raw

LEADER: 03553cam a22003373 4500
001 10535023
005 20151022191329.0
008 131009s2013 dcu 000 0 eng d
020 $a0309291046
020 $a9780309291040
035 $a(OCoLC)ocn859754025
035 $a(OCoLC)859754025
035 $a(NNC)10535023
040 $aYDXCP$cYDXCP$dNRZ$dOCLCO
090 $aQA76.9.U83$bP76 2013
111 2 $aProfessionalizing the nation's cybersecurity workforce? : Criteria for decision-making$d(2013 :$cWashington, D.C.),$jauthor.
245 10 $aProfessionalizing the nation's cybersecurity workforce? :$bCriteria for decision-making /$cCommittee on Professionalizing the Nation's Cybersecurity Workforce : Criteria for Decision-Making; Computer Science and Telecommunication Board; Division on Engineering and Physical Science
264 1 $aWashington, D.C. :$bNational Academies Press,$c[2013]
300 $axiv, 51 pages :$c24 cm
336 $atext$btxt$2rdacontent
337 $aunmediated$bn$2rdamedia
338 $avolume$bnc$2rdacarrier
505 0 $aExecutive Summary -- Cybersecurity, the Cybersecurity Workforce, and Its Development and Professionalization -- Approaches to Professionalization -- Conclusions, Recommendation, and Criteria for Professionalization of Cybersecurity -- Appendix A: Biographies of Committee Members --Appendix B: Workshop Agendas -- Appendix C: Speakers and Participants at Workshops Organized by the Committee.
520 $a"? Criteria for Decision-Making considers approaches to increasing the professionalization of the nation's cybersecurity workforce. This report examines workforce requirements for cybersecurity and the segments and job functions in which professionalization is most needed; the role of assessment tools, certification, licensing, and other means for assessing and enhancing professionalization; and emerging approaches, such as performance-based measures. It also examines requirements for the federal (military and civilian) workforce, the private sector, and state and local government. The report focuses on three essential elements: (1) understanding the context for cybersecurity workforce development, (2) considering the relative advantages, disadvantages, and approaches to professionalizing the nation's cybersecurity workforce, and (3) setting forth criteria that can be used to identify which, if any, specialty areas may require professionalization and set forth criteria for evaluating different approaches and tools for professionalization. Professionalizing the Nation's Cybersecurity Workforce? Criteria for Decision-Making characterizes the current landscape for cybersecurity workforce development and sets forth criteria that the federal agencies participating in the National Initiative for Cybersecurity Education as well as organizations that employ cybersecurity workers could use to identify which specialty areas may require professionalization and to evaluate different approaches and tools for professionalization.
650 0 $aCyberinfrastructure$xSecurity measures$zUnited States.
650 0 $aPersonnel management$zUnited States.
650 0 $aLabor supply$xCyberspace$xSecurity measures$xGovernment policy$zUnited States.
710 2 $aNational Research Council (U.S.).$bDivision on Engineering and Physical Sciences,$esponsoring body.
710 2 $aNational Research Council (U.S.).$bComputer Science and Telecommunications Board,$eissuing body.
856 41 $uhttp://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=18446
852 00 $boff,sci$hQA76.9.U83$iP76 2013g