MARC Record from marc_columbia

LEADER: 02948cam a2200421 a 4500
001 10306500
005 20130722154149.0
008 100315s2010 vaua b f000 0 eng
010 $a 2009526850
035 $a(OCoLC)ocn557391599
035 $a(OCoLC)557391599
035 $a(NNC)10306500
040 $aDLC$beng$cDLC$dOVV$dRCE
043 $an-us---$aa-iq---
050 00 $aJZ6300$b.U55 2010
082 00 $a355.02/80973$222
086 0 $aS 1.154/2:L 56/3
110 1 $aUnited States.$bOffice of the Special Inspector General for Iraq Reconstruction.
245 10 $aApplying Iraq's hard lessons to the reform of stabilization and reconstruction operations /$cSpecial Inspector General for Iraq Reconstruction.
260 $aArlington, VA :$bSpecial Inspector General for Iraq Reconstruction,$c[2010]
300 $aiii, 50 p. :$bcol. ill., col. map ;$c23 cm.
500 $a"February 2010."
504 $aIncludes bibliographical references (p. 45-49).
505 0 $aIntroduction. -- Pt. I. Background on stabilization and reconstruction operations. -- Pt. II. Ten targeted reforms for improving stabilization and reconstruction operations. -- Pt. III. The U.S. Office for Contingency Operations: improving the planning and management of stabilization and reconstruction operations. -- Appendix. -- Endnotes. -- Acronyms.
520 $a"This paper addresses, and proposes an answer to, the question of who should be accountable for planning, managing, and executing stabilization and reconstruction operations (SROs). The U.S. government's existing approach provides no clear answer. Responsibilities for SROS are divided among several agencies, chiefly the Department of State, the Department of Defense, and the United States Agency for International development. As a result, lines of responsibility or accountability are not well-defined. ...This paper is divided into three parts. Part I provides a brief background on SROs. Part II posits ten targeted reforms that could improve SRO execution. Part III proposes a new structural solution to address the weaknesses in SRO planning and management: the U.S. Office for Contingency Operations."--Introd.
650 0 $aNation-building$zUnited States.
651 0 $aUnited States$xArmed Forces$xStability operations.
651 0 $aUnited States$xArmed Forces$xStability operations$xManagement.
650 0 $aPostwar reconstruction$zIraq$xManagement.
651 0 $aUnited States$xArmed Forces$xCivil functions.
650 0 $aIntegrated operations (Military science)
650 0 $aInteragency coordination$zUnited States.
651 0 $aUnited States$xArmed Forces$xOperations other than war.
610 10 $aUnited States.$bDepartment of Defense.
610 10 $aUnited States.$bDepartment of State.
610 10 $aUnited States.$bAgency for International Development.
856 41 $uhttp://www.sigir.mil/files/USOCO/ApplyingHardLessons.pdf#view=fit
852 00 $boff,leh$hJZ6300$i.U55 2010