MARC Record from marc_columbia

LEADER: 03646pam a2200421 a 4500
001 8929029
005 20111004004221.0
008 110201s2011 nyua b 001 0 eng
010 $a 2011003650
020 $a9781107006850 (hardback)
020 $a1107006856 (hardback)
020 $a9780521187251 (paperback)
020 $a0521187257 (paperback)
024 $a40019654528
035 $a(OCoLC)ocn700205679
035 $a(OCoLC)700205679
035 $a(NNC)8929029
040 $aDLC$cDLC$dYDXCP$dNhCcYBP
042 $apcc
043 $aee-----$ae-ur---
050 00 $aJN96.A58$bB876 2011
082 00 $a324.9171/7$222
084 $aPOL000000$2bisacsh
100 1 $aBunce, Valerie,$d1949-
245 10 $aDefeating authoritarian leaders in postcommunist countries /$cValerie J. Bunce, Sharon L. Wolchik.
260 $aNew York :$bCambridge University Press,$c2011.
300 $axi, 373 p. :$bill. ;$c25 cm.
490 1 $aCambridge studies in contentious politics
520 $a"From 1998 to 2005, six elections took place in postcommunist Europe and Eurasia that had the surprising outcome of empowering the opposition and defeating authoritarian incumbents or their designated successors. Valerie J. Bunce and Sharon L. Wolchik compare these unexpected electoral breakthroughs with one another and with elections that had the more typical result of maintaining authoritarian rule. They draw three conclusions. First, the opposition was victorious because of the hard and creative work of a transnational network composed of local opposition and civil society groups, members of the international democracy assistance community, and graduates of successful electoral challenges to authoritarian rule in other countries. Second, the remarkable run of these upset elections reflected the ability of this network to diffuse an ensemble of innovative electoral strategies across state boundaries. Finally, elections can serve as a powerful mechanism for democratic change. This is especially the case when civil society is strong, the transfer of political power is through constitutional means, and opposition leaders win with small mandates"--$cProvided by publisher.
504 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
505 8 $aMachine generated contents note: Part I. The Puzzle: 1. Breakthrough elections: mixed regimes, democracy assistance, and international diffusion; 2. Electoral stability and change in mixed regimes; Part II. Case Studies: 3. The 1998 election in Slovakia and the 2000 election in Croatia: model solidifies and is transferred; 4. Defeating a dictator at the polls and in the streets: the 2000 Yugoslav election; 5. Ukraine: the orange revolution; 6. Georgia and Kyrgyzstan: fraudulent parliamentary elections, mass protests, and presidential abdications; 7. Failed cases: Armenia, Azerbaijan and Belarus; Part III. Comparative Analyses: 8. Explaining divergent electoral outcomes: regime strength, international democracy assistance, and electoral dynamics; 9. The electoral model: evolution and elements; 10. The cross-national diffusion of democratizing elections; 11. After the elections: explaining divergent regime trajectories; 12. Conclusions: democratizing elections, international diffusion and U.S. democracy assistance.
651 0 $aFormer communist countries$xPolitics and government.
650 0 $aDemocracy$zFormer communist countries.
650 0 $aAuthoritarianism$zFormer communist countries.
650 7 $aPOLITICAL SCIENCE / General$2bisacsh
700 1 $aWolchik, Sharon L.
830 0 $aCambridge studies in contentious politics.
852 0 $bleh$hJN96.A58$iB876 2011