MARC Record from marc_columbia

LEADER: 04176pam a22003254a 4500
001 5446375
005 20221110035636.0
008 041116s2005 nyu b 001 0 eng
010 $a 2004027496
015 $aGBA558823$2bnb
020 $a0521853273
020 $a0521618533 (pbk.)
035 $a(OCoLC)ocm57044038
035 $a(NNC)5446375
035 $a5446375
040 $aDLC$cDLC$dYDX$dUKM$dBAKER$dNNC$dOrLoB-B
042 $apcc
050 00 $aBC177$b.F565 2005
082 00 $a160$222
100 1 $aFinocchiaro, Maurice A.,$d1942-$0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n80056692
245 10 $aArguments about arguments :$bsystematic, critical, and historical essays in logical theory /$cMaurice A. Finocchiaro.
260 $aNew York, NY :$bCambridge University Press,$c2005.
300 $aix, 467 pages ;$c24 cm
336 $atext$btxt$2rdacontent
337 $aunmediated$bn$2rdamedia
504 $aIncludes bibliographical references (p. 431-451) and index.
505 00 $tIntroduction : an approach to a branch of logic -- $g1.$tInformal logic and the theory of reasoning (1984) -- $g2.$tAn historical approach to the study of argumentation (1987) -- $g3.$tMethodological problems in empirical logic (1989) -- $g4.$tTwo empirical approaches to the study of reasoning (1994) -- $g5.$tCritical thinking, critical reasoning, and methodological reflection (1996) -- $g6.$tFallacies and the evaluation of reasoning (1981) -- $g7.$tSix types of fallaciousness : toward a realistic theory of logical criticism (1987) -- $g8.$tAsymmetries in argumentation and evaluation (1992) -- $g9.$tThe positive versus the negative evaluation of arguments (1994) -- $g10.$tSiegel on critical thinking : reasoning versus rationality versus criticism (1989) -- $g11.$tInduction and intuition in the normative study of reasoning : Cohen on inductive reasoning in philosophy (1991) -- $g12.$tLogic, politics, and Gramsci : intellectuals, dialectics, and philosophy in the Prison notebooks (1992) -- $g13.$tThe dialectical approach to interpretation and evaluation : from axiom to dialogue (Barth) and from structure to dialogue (Freeman) (1995) -- $g14.$tThe Port-Royal logic's theory of argument : instrumentalism in the philosophy of logic (1997) -- $g15.$tA critique of the dialectical approach, part II : the Amsterdam school and Walton on complex dialogues (1999) -- $g16.$tValid Ad Hominem arguments in philosophy : Johnstone's metaphilosophical informal logic (2001) -- $g17.$tDialectics, evaluation, and argument : Goldman and Johnson on the concept of argument (2003) -- $g18.$tThe concept of Ad Hominem argument in Galileo and Locke (1974) -- $g19.$tNewton's third rule of philosophizing : a role for logic in historiography (1974) -- $g20.$tLogic and rhetoric in Lavoisier's sealed note : toward a rhetoric of science (1977) -- $g21.$tThe concept of judgment and Huygens' theory of gravity (1980) -- $g22.$tEmpiricism, judgment, and argument : toward an informal logic of science (1988) -- $g23.$tCriticism, reasoning, and judgment in science (1995).
520 1 $a"This book brings together a selection of essays by one of the preeminent scholars of informal logic. Following an approach that is empirical but not psychological, dialectical but not dialogical, and focused on interpretation without neglecting evaluation, Maurice Finocchiaro defines concepts such as reasoning, argument, argument analysis, critical reasoning, methodological reflection, judgment, critical thinking, and informal logic. He defends theses about the rarity of fallacies but the frequency of fallacious reasoning; the asymmetry of positive and negative in argumentation, interpretation, and evaluation; and the role of critical thinking in science, among other topics. And he presents extended critiques of the views of many contemporary scholars, while also integrating into the discussion Arnauld's Port-Royal Logic, Gramsci's theory of intellectuals, and case studies from the history of science, particularly the work of Galileo, Newton, Huygens, and Lavoisier."--BOOK JACKET.
650 0 $aReasoning.$0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85111790
852 00 $boff,glx$hBC177$i.F565 2005