| Record ID | marc_columbia/Columbia-extract-20221130-005.mrc:189431462:2804 |
| Source | marc_columbia |
| Download Link | /show-records/marc_columbia/Columbia-extract-20221130-005.mrc:189431462:2804?format=raw |
LEADER: 02804fam a2200397 a 4500
001 2140524
005 20220615213421.0
008 971008t19981998nju b 001 0 eng
010 $a 97042980
020 $a0838637345 (alk. paper)
035 $a(OCoLC)37801462
035 $a(OCoLC)ocm37801462
035 $9ANJ7881CU
035 $a(NNC)2140524
035 $a2140524
040 $aDLC$cDLC$dDLC$dOrLoB-B
043 $ae-ie---
050 00 $aPR6019.O9$bZ7953 1998
082 00 $a823/.912$221
100 1 $aSheffield, Elisabeth.$0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/nb96057239
245 10 $aJoyce's abandoned female costumes, gratefully received /$cElisabeth Sheffield.
260 $aMadison, N.J. :$bFairleigh Dickinson University Press ;$aLondon :$bAssociated University Presses,$c[1998], ©1998.
300 $a147 pages ;$c24 cm
336 $atext$btxt$2rdacontent
337 $aunmediated$bn$2rdamedia
504 $aIncludes bibliographical references (p. 115-142) and index.
505 00 $g1.$tAbandoned Female Costumes, Gratefully Received --$g2.$tThe Mood of Thine, O Timorous, Is His --$g3.$tThe Murmurous Flood Within --$g4.$tAs Easy Stop the Sea --$g5.$tThat Lilith Undeveiled Which Had Undone Him.
520 $aOne major project of Joyce scholarship since the late 1970s has been to reexamine the misogynistic reputation of Joyce's writings, to reevaluate both his images of female characters and his use of the feminine. Using the theoretical lenses of Derrida, Lacan, Cixous, and Irigaray, a number of Joyce scholars have come to view Joyce as a kind of protofeminist who battles phallogocentrism and a largely male canon with a nonlinear, subversively opaque, and feminine writing.
520 8 $aThis book provides a much-needed critique of the Joyce that has emerged out of these studies, a Joyce newly garbed in feminist clothing. While Sheffield's study shares a common presupposition of these recent interpretations, it challenges the idea that the move Joyce makes with this alignment is one that puts him on the side of woman.
520 8 $aSheffield contends that Joyce is not expressing his solidarity with woman or "womanly thought" in opposition to a masculine literary and philosophical tradition, but rather relying on ancient stereotypes to personify a dangerously "other" form of writing.
600 10 $aJoyce, James,$d1882-1941$xKnowledge and learning.
650 0 $aClothing and dress.$0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85027160
650 0 $aWomen and literature$zIreland$xHistory$y20th century.$0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh2008113598
600 10 $aJoyce, James,$d1882-1941$xCharacters$xWomen.
650 0 $aClothing and dress in literature.$0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85033275
852 00 $boff,glx$hPR6019.O9$iZ7953 1998