MARC Record from marc_columbia

LEADER: 03146mam a2200385 a 4500
001 1953906
005 20220609034546.0
008 960430s1997 enka b 001 0 eng
010 $a 96008679
020 $a0521562902
020 $a0521574617 (pbk.)
035 $a(OCoLC)ocm34730298
035 $9AMF3971CU
035 $a(NNC)1953906
035 $a1953906
040 $aDLC$cDLC$dC#P$dOrLoB-B
050 00 $aHM291$b.M638 1997
082 00 $a303.3$220
100 1 $aMolm, Linda D.$0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n96042417
245 10 $aCoercive power in social exchange /$cLinda D. Molm.
260 $aCambridge, UK ;$aNew York, NY, USA :$bCambridge University Press,$c1997.
300 $axii, 316 pages :$billustrations ;$c23 cm.
336 $atext$btxt$2rdacontent
337 $aunmediated$bn$2rdamedia
490 1 $aStudies in rationality and social change
504 $aIncludes bibliographical references (p. [293]-308) and indexes.
505 00 $g1.$tIntroduction and overview --$g2.$tSocial exchange and power --$g3.$tPunishment and coercion --$g4.$tAn experimental setting for studying power in exchange relations --$g5.$tThe early research: experimental tests and theoretical puzzles --$g6.$tThe structural determination of power use --$g7.$tDependence and risk: structural constraints on strategic power use --$g8.$tInjustice and risk: normative constraints on strategic power use --$g9.$tThe effects of coercion: compliance or conflict? --$g10.$tA theory of coercion in social exchange --$g11.$tConclusions and implications --$gAppendix I.$tDefinitions of basic concepts of social exchange --$gAppendix II.$tThe experimental instructions for the standardized setting.
520 $aCoercive Power in Social Exchange describes the progression and results of a decade-long program of experimental research on power in social exchange relations. Exchange theorists have traditionally excluded punishment and coercion from the scope of their analyses; Molm examines whether exchange theory can be expanded to include both reward and coercive power.
520 8 $aWorking within the framework of Emerson's power-dependence theory, but also drawing on the decision theory concepts of strategic action and loss aversion, Molm develops and tests a theory of coercion in social exchange that emphasizes the interdependence of these two bases of power. Her work shows that reward power and coercive power are fundamentally different, not only in their effects on behavior but also in the structural incentive to use power and the risks of power use.
520 8 $aWhen exchanges are nonnegotiated and secured by the "shadow of the future," rather than by binding agreements, dependence both encourages and constrains the use of coercion.
650 0 $aSocial exchange.$0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85123941
650 0 $aPower (Social sciences)$0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85105976
650 0 $aRetribution.$0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh93005823
830 0 $aStudies in rationality and social change.$0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n42023974
852 00 $bleh$hHM291$i.M638 1997