MARC Record from marc_claremont_school_theology

LEADER: 03839cam a2200673 a 4500
001 ocm55730440
003 OCoLC
005 20200617074220.2
008 040624s2004 enk b 001 0 eng d
010 $a 2004426906
040 $aATH$beng$cDLC$dATH$dIDI$dUKM$dBAKER$dBTCTA$dYDXCP$dSHS$dNLGGC$dOCLCQ$dUKMGB$dBDX$dEUM$dOCLCQ$dOCLCO$dMR4$dOCLCA$dOCLCQ$dOCLCF
015 $aGBA450213$2bnb
015 $aGBA472483$2bnb
016 7 $a012949923$2Uk
016 7 $a013007833$2Uk
019 $a56659039$a62888510
020 $a0567081850
020 $a9780567081858
020 $a0567081958$q(pbk.)
020 $a9780567081957$q(pbk.)
029 1 $aAU@$b000025969280
029 1 $aNZ1$b8668504
035 $a(OCoLC)55730440$z(OCoLC)56659039$z(OCoLC)62888510
042 $alccopycat
050 00 $aBS2585.52$b.C735 2004
082 00 $a226.3/066$222
082 04 $a226.3067$222
084 $a11.46$2bcl
049 $aMAIN
100 1 $aCrossley, James G.
245 14 $aThe date of Mark's Gospel :$binsight from the law in earliest Christianity /$cJames G. Crossley.
260 $aLondon ;$aNew York :$bT & T Clark International,$c©2004.
300 $axv, 245 pages ;$c24 cm.
336 $atext$btxt$2rdacontent
337 $aunmediated$bn$2rdamedia
338 $avolume$bnc$2rdacarrier
490 1 $aJournal for the study of the New Testament. Supplement series ;$v266
500 $aRevision of the author's thesis (Ph. D)--University of Nottingham.
504 $aIncludes bibliographical references (pages 210-224) and indexes.
505 00 $tExternal evidence --$tMark 13 --$tDate of Mark and modern gospel criticism --$tJesus' Torah observance in the synoptic gospels --$tTorah and earliest Christianity --$tDating Mark legally (I): 2 test cases (Mk 2.23-28; Mk 10.2-12) --$tDating Mark legally (II): Mark 7.1-23.
520 $aChallenging the view that Mark was written as late as 65-75 CE, James Crossley argues instead for a date thirty years earlier, basing this conclusion on the internal evidence supplied by the gospel itself. After a concise overview of the external evidence, The Date of Mark's Gospel goes on to critically examine the arguments which place the writing of Mark around the time of the Jewish war, suggesting alternative historical contexts. This leads to a discussion of modern literary criticism of the gospel as a whole, outlining the main approaches and their protagonists. Crossley then shows that while the synoptic gospels all portray Jesus as a law-observant Jew, Mark in particular writes assuming that he observed biblical law fully. Arguing that such an assumption could only be made at a time when Christianity was largely law observant, the author offers a comprehensive examination of the evidence on laws provided in the gospel, concluding that this dates the composition of Mark to no later than the mid-40s.
590 $bArchive
630 00 $aBible.$pMark$xCriticism, interpretation, etc.
630 04 $aBible.$pMark.$xCriticism, interpretation, etc.
630 07 $aBible.$pMark.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst01892928
650 0 $aJewish law$xBiblical teaching.
650 17 $aMarcus (bijbelboek)$2gtt
650 17 $aTora.$2gtt
650 17 $aDatering.$2gtt
655 7 $aCriticism, interpretation, etc.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst01411635
830 0 $aJournal for the study of the New Testament.$pSupplement series ;$v266.
856 41 $3Table of contents$uhttp://catdir.loc.gov/catdir/toc/fy051/2004426906.html
938 $aBaker & Taylor$bBKTY$c140.00$d140.00$i0567081850$n0006008762$sactive
938 $aBaker & Taylor$bBKTY$c84.00$d84.00$i0567081958$n0006176152$sactive
938 $aBrodart$bBROD$n02293064$c$125.00
938 $aBaker and Taylor$bBTCP$n2004426906
938 $aYBP Library Services$bYANK$n100372368
994 $a92$bCST
976 $a10017000851