MARC Record from marc_claremont_school_theology

LEADER: 03781cam a22007574a 4500
001 ocm52838588
003 OCoLC
005 20200617073854.3
008 030805s2004 tnu b 001 0 eng
010 $a 2003017643
040 $aDLC$beng$cDLC$dUKM$dBAKER$dNLGGC$dBTCTA$dYDXCP$dOCLCG$dIG#$dGEBAY$dOCLCQ$dUKMGB$dILU$dOCLCF$dOCLCO$dOCLCQ$dOCL
015 $aGBA3V1460$2bnb
016 7 $a010347853$2Uk
019 $a52919587
020 $a0826514405$q(alk. paper)
020 $a9780826514400$q(alk. paper)
029 1 $aAU@$b000024858688
029 1 $aAU@$b000026264492
029 1 $aAU@$b000026463188
029 1 $aGEBAY$b7250220
029 1 $aHEBIS$b120522780
029 1 $aIG#$b9780826514400
029 1 $aNLGGC$b253693586
029 1 $aNZ1$b7891399
029 1 $aYDXCP$b1996676
029 1 $aUKMGB$b010347853
035 $a(OCoLC)52838588$z(OCoLC)52919587
042 $apcc
050 00 $aB945.H354$bD645 2004
082 00 $a111/.85/092$222
084 $a08.25$2bcl
049 $aMAIN
100 1 $aDombrowski, Daniel A.
245 10 $aDivine beauty :$bthe aesthetics of Charles Hartshorne /$cDaniel A. Dombrowski.
250 $a1st ed.
260 $aNashville, TN :$bVanderbilt University Press,$c2004.
300 $ax, 230 pages ;$c24 cm.
336 $atext$btxt$2rdacontent
337 $aunmediated$bn$2rdamedia
338 $avolume$bnc$2rdacarrier
490 1 $aThe Vanderbilt library of American philosophy
504 $aIncludes bibliographical references (pages 211-225) and index.
505 0 $aHistoric and thematic background -- Beauty as a mean -- The aesthetic attitude -- Birdsong -- Sensation/feeling -- Panexperientialism -- Beauty merely in the eye of the beholder? -- The religious dimensions of aesthetic experience -- Absolute beauty? -- Death and contributionism.
520 1 $a"Divine Beauty offers the first detailed explication of Hartshorne's aesthetic theory and its place within his theocentric philosophy." "As Daniel A. Dombrowski explains, Hartshorne advanced a neoclassical or process theism that contrasted with the "classical" theism defended by traditionalist Jews, Christians, and Muslim believers. His conception of God was dipolar, which could attribute to God certain qualities that traditionalists would exclude. For example, in Hartshorne's view, God can embrace excellent aspects of both activity and passivity, or of permanence and change; classical theists, on the other hand, exlude passivity and change from their conceptions."
520 8 $a"Filling an important gap in our understanding of Hartshorne, Divine Beauty also makes a persuasive case for the superiority of his neoclassical theism over classical theism."--Jacket.
590 $bArchive
600 10 $aHartshorne, Charles,$d1897-2000$xAesthetics.
600 17 $aHartshorne, Charles,$d1897-2000$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst00009387
600 17 $aHartshorne, Charles.$2swd
650 0 $aAesthetics, Modern$y20th century.
650 7 $aAesthetics.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst00798702
650 7 $aAesthetics, Modern.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst00798800
650 17 $aGodsdienstfilosofie.$2gtt
650 17 $aEsthetica.$2gtt
650 17 $aMetafysica.$2gtt
650 07 $aÄsthetik.$2swd
648 7 $a1900-1999$2fast
830 0 $aVanderbilt library of American philosophy.
856 41 $3Table of contents$uhttp://catdir.loc.gov/catdir/toc/ecip047/2003017643.html
856 42 $3Publisher description$uhttp://catdir.loc.gov/catdir/enhancements/fy0728/2003017643-d.html
938 $aBaker & Taylor$bBKTY$c59.95$d59.95$i0826514405$n0004257076$sactive
938 $aBaker and Taylor$bBTCP$nBK0006659890
938 $aIngram$bINGR$n9780826514400
938 $aYBP Library Services$bYANK$n1996676
994 $a92$bCST
976 $a10017020304