| Record ID | marc_claremont_school_theology/CSTMARC2_multibarcode.mrc:24469588:3645 |
| Source | marc_claremont_school_theology |
| Download Link | /show-records/marc_claremont_school_theology/CSTMARC2_multibarcode.mrc:24469588:3645?format=raw |
LEADER: 03645cam a22006974a 4500
001 ocm49421744
003 OCoLC
005 20200617075048.3
008 020312s2002 enk b 001 0 eng
010 $a 2002024648
040 $aDLC$beng$cDLC$dUKM$dIXT$dDAY$dPUL$dBAKER$dMUQ$dNLGGC$dBTCTA$dYDXCP$dIG#$dOCLCQ$dOCLCF$dOCLCO$dSDA$dOCLCQ$dDHA$dBUB
015 $aGBA2V9569$2bnb
019 $a50271465$a50782264$a59464292$a155813892$a890078033$a905588879
020 $a0521817234
020 $a9780521817233
029 1 $aAU@$b000023471773
029 1 $aNZ1$b7065743
029 1 $aYDXCP$b1880713
035 $a(OCoLC)49421744$z(OCoLC)50271465$z(OCoLC)50782264$z(OCoLC)59464292$z(OCoLC)155813892$z(OCoLC)890078033$z(OCoLC)905588879
042 $apcc
050 00 $aBS2555.52$b.C37 2002
082 00 $a226/.066$221
084 $a11.46$2bcl
084 $a052
049 $aMAIN
100 1 $aCasey, Maurice.
245 13 $aAn Aramaic approach to Q :$bsources for the Gospels of Matthew and Luke /$cMaurice Casey.
260 $aCambridge, U.K. ;$aNew York :$bCambridge University Press,$c2002.
300 $ax, 210 pages ;$c23 cm.
336 $atext$btxt$2rdacontent
337 $aunmediated$bn$2rdamedia
338 $avolume$bnc$2rdacarrier
490 1 $aSociety for New Testament Studies monograph series ;$v122
504 $aIncludes bibliographical references (pages 191-205) and indexes.
505 0 $a1. The state of play -- 2. Method -- 3. Scribes and pharisees: Matthew 23.23-36; Luke 11.39-51 -- 4. John the Baptist: Matthew 11.2-19; Luke 7.18-35 -- 5. Exorcism and overlapping sources. Mark 3.20-30; Matthew 12.22-32; Luke 11.14-23; 12.10 -- 6. Conclusions.
520 2 $aMaurice Casey gives a detailed examination of key passages in Matthew and Luke's gospels, demonstrating that they used two different Greek translations of an Aramaic source, which can be reconstructed. He overturns the conventional model of Q as a single Greek document, and shows that Jesus said everything in the original Aramaic source. Casey argues that Aramaic sources behind part of Q are of extremely early date, and should contribute significantly to the quest for the historical Jesus.
590 $bArchive
630 04 $aBible$xCriticism.$pMatthew.
630 04 $aBible$xCriticism.$pLuke.
650 0 $aQ hypothesis (Synoptics criticism)
650 0 $aAramaic literature$xRelation to the New Testament.
650 6 $aDocument Q (Critique biblique)
650 6 $aLittérature araméenne$xRelation avec le Nouveau Testament.
650 7 $aAramaic literature$xRelation to the New Testament.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst00812689
650 7 $aQ hypothesis (Synoptics criticism)$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst01084793
650 17 $aMattheüs (bijbelboek)$2gtt
650 17 $aLucas (bijbelboek)$2gtt
650 17 $aQ-bron.$2gtt
650 17 $aDode-Zeerollen.$2gtt
650 17 $aAramees.$2gtt
830 0 $aMonograph series (Society for New Testament Studies) ;$v122.
856 41 $3Sample text$uhttp://catdir.loc.gov/catdir/samples/cam033/2002024648.html
856 41 $3Table of contents$uhttp://catdir.loc.gov/catdir/toc/cam024/2002024648.html
856 42 $3Contributor biographical information$uhttp://catdir.loc.gov/catdir/enhancements/fy0731/2002024648-b.html
856 42 $3Publisher description$uhttp://catdir.loc.gov/catdir/description/cam022/2002024648.html
938 $aBaker & Taylor$bBKTY$c90.00$d90.00$i0521817234$n0003946517$sactive
938 $aBaker and Taylor$bBTCP$n2002024648
938 $aIngram$bINGR$n9780521817233
938 $aYBP Library Services$bYANK$n1880713
994 $a92$bCST
976 $a10017015921