| Record ID | ia:whywelostera0000mans_h8j7 |
| Source | Internet Archive |
| Download MARC XML | https://archive.org/download/whywelostera0000mans_h8j7/whywelostera0000mans_h8j7_marc.xml |
| Download MARC binary | https://www.archive.org/download/whywelostera0000mans_h8j7/whywelostera0000mans_h8j7_meta.mrc |
LEADER: 03667cam a2200781 i 4500
001 ocm13859191
003 OCoLC
005 20191109073604.8
008 860627s1986 ilu b 001 0 eng
010 $a 86006954
040 $aDLC$beng$erda$cDLC$dUKM$dEL$$dBAKER$dNLGGC$dBTCTA$dYDXCP$dAU@$dMOF$dNLA$dNIALS$dDEBBG$dMUO$dGCD$dBDX$dVFQ$dGTA$dOCLCF$dOVY$dOCLCQ$dOKX$dOCLCO$dILM$dOCLCQ$dCSJ$dOCLCQ$dBRL$dOCLCQ$dOCLCA$dBGU$dOCLCQ$dCPS$dBDP$dOCLCA
015 $aGB8808250$2bnb
019 $a17441905$a144707030
020 $a9780226503585$q(paperback)
020 $a0226503585$q(paperback)
020 $z9780226503578
020 $z0226503577
029 1 $aAU@$b000004756343
029 1 $aDEBBG$bBV007713472
029 1 $aGBVCP$b024189715
029 1 $aHR0$b0226503577
029 1 $aNZ1$b3318605
029 1 $aYDXCP$b131660
035 $a(OCoLC)13859191$z(OCoLC)17441905$z(OCoLC)144707030
043 $an-us---
050 00 $aHQ1236.5.U6$bM37 1986
055 4 $aHQ1236.5 U5 M35
060 4 $a305.42 M286w
082 00 $a305.4/2/0973$219
084 $a71.31$2bcl
084 $a86.21$2bcl
084 $aHU 1075$2rvk
049 $aMAIN
100 1 $aMansbridge, Jane J.
245 10 $aWhy we lost the ERA /$cJane J. Mansbridge.
250 $aFirst edition.
264 1 $aChicago :$bUniversity of Chicago Press,$c1986.
264 4 $c©1986
300 $axii, 327 pages ;$c24 cm
336 $atext$btxt$2rdacontent
337 $aunmediated$bn$2rdamedia
338 $avolume$bnc$2rdacarrier
504 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
505 0 $aWhy we lost the ERA -- A very brief history -- Rights versus substance -- The amendment process -- 59 cents -- The court catches up -- The ERA and the war powers clauses -- A decision by accretion -- Of husbands and toilets -- Ideology and activism -- Reaction in the legislature -- Organizing in Illinois : a case study -- A movement or a sect? -- Requiescat in pace.
520 $aThe Equal Rights Amendment (ERA), which would have guaranteed women the same equal rights as men, passed Congress with an overwhelming majority in 1972. During the following ten years, the public repeatedly endorsed it in opinion surveys. Yet, for all the favor it enjoyed in the abstract, the ERA was never able to muster concrete support in enough states to become the law of the land. In this provocative and controversial book, the author explains why, as she argues that the ERA failed because it did not result in substantive changes in the position of women.
586 $aAmerican Political Science Association Gladys M. Kammerer Award, 1987.
590 $bInternet Archive - 2
590 $bInternet Archive 2
650 0 $aWomen's rights$zUnited States.
650 0 $aEqual rights amendments$zUnited States.
650 0 $aFeminism$zUnited States.
650 7 $aEqual rights amendments.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst00914449
650 7 $aFeminism.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst00922671
650 7 $aWomen's rights.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst01178818
651 7 $aUnited States.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst01204155
650 7 $aFrauenbewegung$2gnd
651 7 $aUSA$2gnd
651 7 $aUSA.$2swd
650 4 $aIgualdad de derechos, Enmienda$zEE. UU.
650 4 $aFeminismo$zEE. UU.
653 $aUnited States$aSex discrimination$aLaw: Equal Rights Amendment
938 $aBaker & Taylor$bBKTY$c19.00$d19.00$i0226503585$n0001079927$sactive
938 $aBrodart$bBROD$n37321293$c$42.00
938 $aBaker and Taylor$bBTCP$n86006954
938 $aYBP Library Services$bYANK$n211651
938 $aYBP Library Services$bYANK$n131660
994 $a92$bERR
976 $a31927000735362