It looks like you're offline.
Open Library logo
additional options menu

MARC record from Internet Archive

LEADER: 03752cam a2200805 i 4500
001 ocm39189891
003 OCoLC
005 20191109072030.5
008 980514t19981998mau b 001 0 eng
010 $a 98023318
040 $aDLC$beng$erda$cDLC$dUKM$dMUQ$dBAKER$dNLGGC$dBTCTA$dYDXCP$dUQ1$dUBC$dZEM$dGEBAY$dGBU$dDEBBG$dOCLCF$dOCLCQ$dCSJ$dOCLCO$dDHA$dOCLCQ$dMBE$dOCLCQ$dOCLCA$dCCH$dKFH$dFUG$dOCLCQ$dOCLCO$dAZU$dAUD$dOCLCQ$dOCLCO$dBUF$dOCLCO
015 $aGB9939458$2bnb
015 $aGB98V3794$2bnb
019 $a318434008$a625046047$a968975893$a1102294833
020 $a0674950895$q(alk. paper)
020 $a9780674950894$q(alk. paper)
029 1 $aAU@$b000013922516
029 1 $aDEBBG$bBV012475220
029 1 $aGEBAY$b5902995
029 1 $aHR0$b0674950895
029 1 $aNZ1$b4941068
029 1 $aNZ1$b683478
029 1 $aUNITY$b04731480X
029 1 $aYDXCP$b1493165
029 1 $aYDXCP$b1699253
035 $a(OCoLC)39189891$z(OCoLC)318434008$z(OCoLC)625046047$z(OCoLC)968975893$z(OCoLC)1102294833
050 00 $aBJ1411$b.S36 1998
082 00 $a170$221
084 $a08.38$2bcl
084 $aCC 7200$2rvk
084 $a5,1$2ssgn
049 $aMAIN
100 1 $aScanlon, Thomas,$eauthor.
245 10 $aWhat we owe to each other /$cT.M. Scanlon.
264 1 $aCambridge, Massachusetts ;$aLondon :$bBelknap Press of Harvard University Press,$c1998.
264 4 $c©1998
300 $aix, 420 pages ;$c24 cm
336 $atext$btxt$2rdacontent
337 $aunmediated$bn$2rdamedia
338 $avolume$bnc$2rdacarrier
500 $aBook based on material presented at meetings and colloquiums; several chapters have been previously published in various journals.
504 $aIncludes bibliographical references (pages 409-416) and index.
520 $aHow do we judge whether an action is morally right or wrong? If an action is wrong, what reason does that give us not to do it? Why should we give such reasons priority over our other concerns and values? In this book, T.M. Scanlon offers new answers to these questions, as they apply to the central part of morality that concerns what we owe to each other. According to his contractualist view, thinking about right and wrong is thinking about what we do in terms that could be justified to others and that they could not reasonably reject. Scanlon bases his contractualism on a broader account of reasons, value, and individual well-being that challenges standard views about these crucial notions.
505 00 $g1.$tReasons and values --$g1.$tReasons --$g2.$tValues --$g3.$tWell-being --$g2.$tRight and wrong --$g4.$tWrongness and reasons --$g5.$tThe structure of contractualism --$g6.$tResponsibility --$g7.$tPromises --$g8.$tRelativism.
590 $bInternet Archive - 2
590 $bInternet Archive 2
650 0 $aRight and wrong.
650 0 $aJudgment (Ethics)
650 0 $aValues.
650 6 $aRectitude.
650 6 $aJugement (Morale)
650 7 $aJudgment (Ethics)$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst00984586
650 7 $aRight and wrong.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst01097858
650 7 $aValues.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst01163906
650 7 $aDas Böse$2gnd
650 7 $aDas Gute$2gnd
650 7 $aMoralisches Urteil$2gnd
650 17 $aEthiek.$2gtt
650 7 $aBien (Morale)$2rasuqam
650 7 $aÉthique.$2rasuqam
650 7 $aJugement (Morale)$2rasuqam
650 7 $aMal.$2rasuqam
650 07 $aMoralisches Urteil.$2swd
650 07 $aDas Gute.$2swd
650 07 $aDas Böse.$2swd
938 $aBaker & Taylor$bBKTY$c54.50$d54.50$i0674950895$n0003174006$sactive
938 $aBaker and Taylor$bBTCP$n98023318
938 $aYBP Library Services$bYANK$n1699253
994 $a92$bERR
976 $a31927000680535