MARC record from Internet Archive

LEADER: 03818cam a2200541 a 4500
001 2007298694
003 DLC
005 20080917091423.0
008 070823s2007 caua b 000 0 eng d
010 $a 2007298694
020 $a9780833041869 (pbk. : alk. paper)
020 $a083304186X (pbk. : alk. paper)
020 $a0833038346 (pbk. : alk. paper)
020 $a9780833038340 (pbk. : alk. paper)
027 $aRAND/DB-525-CTRMP
035 $a(OCoLC)ocn149131505
035 $a(OCoLC)149131505
040 $aRSM$cRSM$dWLL$dBAKER$dDLC
042 $alccopycat
043 $an-us---
050 00 $aHG8054.5$b.T73 2007
245 00 $aTrade-offs among alternative government interventions in the market for terrorism insurance :$binterim results /$cLloyd Dixon ... [et al.].
260 $aSanta Monica, Calif. :$bRAND,$c2007.
300 $axvii, 113, p. :$bill. (mostly col.) ;$c28 cm.
490 1 $aDocumented briefing / RAND ;$v525
504 $aIncludes bibliographical references (p. 111-113).
505 0 $aIntroduction -- Consequences of Allowing TRIA to Expire -- Consequences of a Mandatory CBRN Offer Without Other Program Changes -- Conclusions and Next Steps -- Appendix A: Summary of the Appendixes -- Appendix B: Robust Decisionmaking -- Appendix C: Uncertainties, Government Interventions, and Outcome Measures -- Appendix D: Take-Up Rate Model -- Appendix E: Risk Management Solutions Attack Model -- Appendix F: Loss Distribution Model -- Appendix G: Robust Decisionmaking Analysis.
520 $aThis documented briefing presents interim findings from a RAND Center for Terrorism Risk Management Policy (CTRMP) project that aims to inform the debate over extending the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act of 2002 (TRIA), as modified in 2005. The study uses analytic tools for identifying and assessing key trade-offs among strategies under conditions with considerable uncertainty to assess three alternative government interventions in the market for terrorism insurance: TRIA; no government terrorism insurance program; and extending TRIA without other changes in the program to required insurers to offer coverage for chemical, biological, radiological, or nuclear (CBRN) attacks. The results suggest that TRIA performs better on the outcome measures examined for conventional attacks than letting the program expire but does not effectively address the risks CBRN attacks present to either businesses or taxpayers. The research also shows that requiring insurers to offer CBRN coverage without other program changes has little upside for CBRN attacks and can have significant unintended consequences in dealing with conventional attacks.
530 $aAlso available on the internet via WWW in PDF format.
650 0 $aRisk management$zUnited States.
650 0 $aRisk (Insurance)$zUnited States.
650 0 $aTerrorism insurance$zUnited States.
650 0 $aTerrorism$xEconomic aspects$zUnited States.
650 0 $aTerrorism$xRisk assessment$zUnited States.
650 0 $aDisaster insurance.
650 0 $aCompensation management$zUnited States.
700 1 $aDixon, Lloyd S.
700 1 $aLempert, Robert J.
700 1 $aLaTourrette, Tom,$d1963-
700 1 $aReville, Robert T.
700 1 $aSteinberg, Paul,$d1953-
710 2 $aRAND Center for Terrorism Risk Management Policy.
710 2 $aRand Infrastructure, Safety, and Environment (Organization)
710 2 $aRand Corporation.
787 1 $7nnam$tAssessing policy options for renewing the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act : interim results$rRAND/RB-9266-CTRMP
830 0 $aDocumented briefing (Rand Corporation) ;$v525
856 41 $zOnline access$uhttp://www.rand.org/pubs/documented_briefings/DB525/$zCONNECT online
856 41 $3Table of contents$uhttp://www.loc.gov/catdir/toc/fy0801/2007298694.html