MARC record from Internet Archive

LEADER: 03806cam 2200589Ii 4500
001 ocn895714142
003 OCoLC
005 20220328212129.0
008 141117t20152015be b 001 0 eng d
040 $aYDXCP$beng$erda$cYDXCP$dBTCTA$dUKMGB$dCDX$dOHX$dOCLCQ$dERASA$dSTF$dOCLCO$dUAB$dDRU$dOCLCF$dXII$dOCL$dOBE$dPSC
015 $aGBB502235$2bnb
016 7 $a017002264$2Uk
020 $a9782503548067
020 $a2503548067
035 $a(OCoLC)895714142
043 $ae-uk-en
050 4 $aBV193.G7$bS25 2015
072 7 $aBX$2lcco
072 7 $aZ$2lcco
082 04 $a264/.00942/0902$223
100 1 $aSalisbury, Matthew Cheung,$eauthor.
245 14 $aThe secular liturgical office in late medieval England /$cby Matthew Cheung Salisbury.
264 1 $aTurnhout, Belgium :$bBrepols Publishers n.v.,$c[2015]
264 4 $c©2015
300 $axvi, 257 pages ;$c24 cm.
336 $atext$btxt$2rdacontent
337 $aunmediated$bn$2rdamedia
338 $avolume$bnc$2rdacarrier
490 1 $aMedieval church studies ;$vvolume 36
520 $a"Until recently, research on the late medieval English Office liturgy has suggested that all manuscripts of the same liturgical Use, including those of the celebrated and widespread Uses of Sarum and York, are in large part interchangeable and uniform. This study demonstrates, through detailed analyses of the manuscript breviaries and antiphonals of each secular liturgical Use of medieval England, that such books do share a common textual core. But this is in large part restricted to a single genre of text — the responsory. Other features, even within manuscripts of the same Use, are subject to striking and significant variation, influenced by local customs and hagiographical and textual priorities, and also by varying reception to liturgical prescriptions from ecclesiastical authorities. The identification of the characteristic features of each Use and the differentiation of regional patterns have resulted from treating each manuscript as a unique witness, a practice which is not common in liturgical studies, but one which gives the manuscripts greater value as historical sources. The term ‘Use’, often employed as a descriptor of orthodoxy, may itself imply a greater uniformity than ever existed, for the ways that the ‘Use of Sarum’, a liturgical pattern originally designed for enactment in a single cathedral, was realised in countless other venues for worship were dependent on the times, places, and contexts in which the rites were celebrated."--$cProvided by publisher.
504 $aIncludes bibliographical references (pages 233-244) and index.
505 0 $aIntroduction -- Studying the English office liturgy -- Liturgical analysis -- Textual analysis -- The regulation and transmission of secular liturgy -- Conclusion.
540 $aBritish Library not licensed to copy$c0.$5Uk
610 20 $aCatholic Church$zEngland$xLiturgy$xHistory.
650 0 $aDivine office$xHistory.
650 0 $aLiturgics$zEngland.
610 27 $aCatholic Church.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst00531720
650 7 $aDivine office.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst00895757
650 7 $aLiturgics.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst01000579
651 7 $aEngland.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst01219920
655 7 $aHistory.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst01411628
830 0 $aMedieval church studies ;$v36.
938 $aBaker and Taylor$bBTCP$nBK0016052378
938 $aCoutts Information Services$bCOUT$n30167107
938 $aOtto Harrassowitz$bHARR$nhar155004113
938 $aYBP Library Services$bYANK$n12162069
938 $aErasmus Boekhandel$bERAA$nNTS0000196735
029 1 $aNLGGC$b395074665
029 1 $aUNITY$b135637864
029 1 $aUKMGB$b017002264
994 $aZ0$bP4A
948 $hNO HOLDINGS IN P4A - 75 OTHER HOLDINGS