It looks like you're offline.
Open Library logo
additional options menu

MARC record from Internet Archive

LEADER: 03687cam a22004097i 4500
001 2013454897
003 DLC
005 20140604082230.0
008 140505t20132013dcu b 100 0 eng d
010 $a 2013454897
020 $a0309291046
020 $a9780309291040
035 $a(OCoLC)ocn859754025
040 $aYDXCP$beng$cYDXCP$erda$dNRZ$dOCLCO$dNDD$dIXA$dNRC$dCDX$dBTCTA$dDLC
042 $alccopycat
043 $an-us---
050 00 $aQA76.9.C92$bP764 2013
245 00 $aProfessionalizing the nation's cybersecurity workforce? :$bcriteria for decision-making /$cCommittee on Professionalizing the Nation's Cybersecurity Workforce: Criteria for Future Decision-Making, Computer Science and Telecommunications Board, Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences, National Research Council of the National Academies.
264 1 $aWashington, D.C. :$bNational Academies Press,$c[2013]
264 4 $c©2013
300 $axiv, 51 pages ;$c24 cm
336 $atext$btxt$2rdacontent
337 $aunmediated$bn$2rdamedia
338 $avolume$bnc$2rdacarrier
500 $a"The principal input to this study came from a series of three workshops convened by the study committee and held in Washington, D.C. [December 12-13, 2012], San Francisco, California [February 25-26, 2013] ... and San Antonio, Texas [March 27, 2013]"--Page ix.
500 $aWorkshop agendas included.
520 $aThis report considers approaches to increasing the professionalization of the nation's cybersecurity workforce. It examines workforce requirements for cybersecurity and the segments and job functions in which professionalization is most needed; the role of assessment tools, certification, licensing, and other means for assessing and enhancing professionalization; and emerging approaches, such as performance-based measures. It also examines requirements for the federal (military and civilian) workforce, the private sector, and state and local government. The report focuses on three essential elements: (1) understanding the context for cybersecurity workforce development, (2) considering the relative advantages, disadvantages, and approaches to professionalizing the nation's cybersecurity workforce, and (3) setting forth criteria that can be used to identify which, if any, specialty areas may require professionalization. It also sets forth criteria for evaluating different approaches and tools for professionalization.
505 0 $aExecutive Summary -- Cybersecurity, the Cybersecurity Workforce, and Its Development and Professionalization -- Approaches to Professionalization -- Conclusions, Recommendation, and Criteria for Professionalization of Cybersecurity -- Appendix A: Biographies of Committee Members --Appendix B: Workshop Agendas -- Appendix C: Speakers and Participants at Workshops Organized by the Committee.
504 $aIncludes bibliographical references.
650 0 $aCyberinfrastructure$xSecurity measures$zUnited States$vCongresses.
650 0 $aComputer networks$xSecurity measures$zUnited States$vCongresses.
650 0 $aComputer industry$xEmployees$xSupply and demand$zUnited States$vCongresses.
650 0 $aCyber intelligence (Computer security)$zUnited States$vCongresses.
650 0 $aPersonnel management$zUnited States$vCongresses.
710 2 $aNational Research Council (U.S.).$bCommittee on Professionalizing the Nation's Cybersecurity Workforce: Criteria for Future Decision-Making,$eissuing body.
710 2 $aNational Research Council (U.S.).$bDivision on Engineering and Physical Sciences,$esponsoring body.
710 2 $aNational Research Council (U.S.).$bComputer Science and Telecommunications Board,$eissuing body.