Record ID | ia:powerofprecedent0000gerh |
Source | Internet Archive |
Download MARC XML | https://archive.org/download/powerofprecedent0000gerh/powerofprecedent0000gerh_marc.xml |
Download MARC binary | https://www.archive.org/download/powerofprecedent0000gerh/powerofprecedent0000gerh_meta.mrc |
LEADER: 02937cam 2200517Ia 4500
001 ocn739046162
003 OCoLC
005 20220408140737.0
008 110705t20112008enk b 001 0 eng d
007 ta
040 $aYDXCP$beng$cYDXCP$dZQP$dILK$dOCLCF$dOCLCO$dCHVBK$dOCLCQ$dGILDS$dUKMGB$dIL4J6$dOCLCO
015 $aGBB266415$2bnb
016 7 $a015877714$2Uk
020 $a0199795797
020 $a9780199795796
035 $a(OCoLC)739046162
043 $an-us---
050 4 $aKF429$b.G47 2011
080 $a340.142(73)
082 04 $a347.73262
100 1 $aGerhardt, Michael J.,$d1956-
245 14 $aThe power of precedent /$cMichael J. Gerhardt.
260 $aOxford ;$aNew York :$bOxford University Press,$c2011, ©2008.
300 $a350 pages ;$c24 cm
336 $atext$btxt$2rdacontent
337 $aunmediated$bn$2rdamedia
338 $avolume$bnc$2rdacarrier
504 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
505 0 $aThe patterns of Supreme Court precedent -- Theories of precedent -- The golden rule -- Non-judicial precedent -- The multiple functions of precedent -- Super precedent -- Conclusion: The future of precedent -- Afterword.
520 $aThe role that precedent plays in constitutional decision-making is a perennially divisive subject among legal scholars and political scientists. The debate rages over both empirical and normative aspects of the issue: to what extent are the Supreme Court and other constitutional actors constrained by precedent? To what extent should they be? The disagreements extend even to the meaning of precedent itself: does precedent consist of merely a prior holding or ruling? Or does it include the reasoning underlying the judgment? Taking up a topic long overdue for comprehensive treatment, Gerhardt provides the first book-length analysis of precedent by a legal scholar in several decades. Gerhardt clearly outlines the major issues in the ongoing debates about the significance of precedence, and offers his own novel theory for understanding the institutional power of precedence as a source of constraint on the constitutional decision-making of the Court, the presidency, and the Congress.
650 0 $aStare decisis$zUnited States.
650 0 $aLaw$zUnited States$xInterpretation and construction.
650 7 $aLaw$xInterpretation and construction.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst00993756
650 7 $aStare decisis.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst01131613
651 7 $aUnited States.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst01204155
650 7 $aPräzedenzfall$2gnd
650 7 $aVerfassungsrecht$2gnd
651 7 $aUSA$2gnd
650 7 $aStare decisis$zUnited States.$2nli
650 7 $aLaw$zUnited States$xInterpretation and construction.$2nli
938 $aYBP Library Services$bYANK$n6954128
029 1 $aCHDSB$b005954122
029 1 $aCHVBK$b125509928
029 1 $aUKMGB$b015877714
994 $aZ0$bP4A
948 $hNO HOLDINGS IN P4A - 24 OTHER HOLDINGS