It looks like you're offline.
Open Library logo
additional options menu

MARC record from Internet Archive

LEADER: 02423cam a22003497i 4500
001 2013444677
003 DLC
005 20140430082353.0
008 140402s2012 dcua b 000 0 eng d
010 $a 2013444677
020 $a0309313546
020 $a9780309313544
035 $a(OCoLC)ocn822894397
040 $aYDXCP$beng$cYDXCP$erda$dOCLCQ$dBTCTA$dAAA$dNTD$dAAA$dBWX$dNRZ$dFQG$dOCLCQ$dCQ#$dOCLCO$dDLC
042 $alccopycat
043 $an-us---
050 00 $aTL521.312$b.N386 2012
110 2 $aNational Research Council (U.S.).$bCommittee on NASA's Strategic Direction.
245 10 $aNASA's strategic direction and the need for a national consensus /$cCommitee on NASA's Strategic Direction ; Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences ; National Research Council of the National Academies.
264 1 $aWashington, D.C. :$bThe National Academies Press,$c2012.
300 $axi, 67 pages . :$billustrations (some color) ;$c28 cm
336 $atext$btxt$2rdacontent
337 $aunmediated$bn$2rdamedia
338 $avolume$bnc$2rdacarrier
504 $aIncludes bibliographical references.
520 $aNASA is widely admired for astonishing accomplishments since its formation in 1958. Looking ahead over a comparable period of time, what can the nation and the world expect of NASA? What will be the agency's goals and objectives, and what will be the strategy for achieving them? More fundamentally, how will the goals, objectives, and strategy be established and by whom? How will they be modified to reflect changes in science, technology, national priorities, and available resources? After a "comprehensive independent assessment of NASA's strategic direction and agency management", the NRC Committee determined that, only with a national consensus on the agency's future strategic direction can NASA continue to deliver the wonder, the knowledge, the national security and economic benefits, and the technology that have been typified by its earlier history. This report summarizes the findings and recommendations of the Committee.
650 0 $aAeronautics$zUnited States$xPlanning.
650 0 $aAstrophysics$xResearch$zUnited States$xPlanning.
650 0 $aStrategic planning.
610 10 $aUnited States.$bNational Aeronautics and Space Administration$xPlanning.
650 7 $aNASA programs.$2nasat
856 41 $3National Academies Press$uhttp://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=18248