It looks like you're offline.
Open Library logo
additional options menu

MARC record from Internet Archive

LEADER: 03168cam 2200373 i 4500
001 9925247301001661
005 20160827064321.1
008 160405t20162016nyua b 001 0 eng
010 $a 2016016314
020 $a9781107155503$qhardcover
020 $a1107155509$qhardcover
035 $a99968775458
035 $a(OCoLC)946076291
035 $a(OCoLC)ocn946076291
040 $aDLC$erda$beng$cDLC$dYDX$dBTCTA$dOCLCF
042 $apcc
050 00 $aK213$b.R488 2016
082 00 $a340/.14$223
245 00 $aRhetorical processes and legal judgments :$bhow language and arguments shape struggles for rights and power /$cedited by Austin Sarat.
264 1 $aNew York, NY :$bCambridge University Press,$c2016.
264 4 $c℗♭2016
300 $axi, 145 pages ;$c24 cm
336 $atext$btxt$2rdacontent
337 $aunmediated$bn$2rdamedia
338 $avolume$bnc$2rdacarrier
504 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
520 $a"Over the last several decades legal scholars have plumbed law's rhetorical life. Scholars have done so under various rubrics, with law and literature being among the most fruitful venues for the exploration of law's rhetoric and the way rhetoric shapes law. Today, new approaches are shaping this exploration. Among the most important of these approaches is the turn toward history and toward what might be called an 'embedded' analysis of rhetoric in law. Historical and embedded approaches locate that analysis in particular contexts, seeking to draw our attention to how the rhetorical dimensions of legal life works in those contexts. Rhetorical Processes and Legal Judgments seeks to advance that mode of analysis and also to contribute to the understanding of the rhetorical structure of judicial arguments and opinions"--$cProvided by publisher.
520 $a"Over the last several decades legal scholars have plumbed law's rhetorical life. Scholars have done so under various rubrics, with law and literature being among the most fruitful venues for the exploration of law's rhetoric and the way rhetoric shapes law. Today, new approaches are shaping this exploration. Among the most important of these approaches is the turn toward history and toward what might be called an "embedded" analysis of rhetoric in law"--$cProvided by publisher.
505 8 $aMachine generated contents note: The relevance of rhetoric: an introduction Austin Sarat; 1. From 'equality before the law' to 'separate but equal': legal rhetoric, legal history and Roberts v. Boston (1849) Eric Slauter; 2. The civlizing hand of law: defending the legal process in the civil rights era Christopher W. Schmidt; 3. The evolving rhetoric of gay rights and same-sex marriage debate Teresa Godwin Phelps; 4. The rhetoric of precedent Bernadette Meyler; 5. Alternative perspectives on legal rhetoric: persuasion, invitation and argument Linda L. Berger; Afterword. Use your words: rhetoric as absence of law, rhetoric as essence of law Adam Steinman.
650 0 $aLaw$xLanguage.
650 0 $aLaw$xLanguage$xHistory.
700 1 $aSarat, Austin,$eeditor.
947 $hCIRCSTACKS$r31786103038078
980 $a99968775458