MARC record from Internet Archive

LEADER: 05021cam 2200541 a 4500
001 ocm64208389
003 OCoLC
005 20191127004602.0
008 060216s2006 miu bv 001 0 eng
010 $a 2006041173
040 $aDLC$beng$cDLC$dIG#$dBAKER$dMRH$dXY4$dBTCTA$dYDXCP$dOCLCQ$dGVA$dHEBIS$dBDX$dOCLCF$dOCLCO$dOCLCQ$dGILDS$dOCLCO
019 $a79433213
020 $a0737734493
020 $a9780737734492
035 $a(OCoLC)64208389$z(OCoLC)79433213
042 $apcc
043 $an-us---
050 00 $aKF4774.A7$bF74 2006
082 00 $a342.7308/53$222
245 00 $aFreedom of the press /$cRob Edelman, book editor.
260 $aFarmington Hills, Mich. :$bGreenhaven Press ;$aDetroit [Mich.] :$bThomson Gale,$c℗♭2006.
300 $a181 pages ;$c24 cm.
336 $atext$btxt$2rdacontent
337 $aunmediated$bn$2rdamedia
338 $avolume$bnc$2rdacarrier
490 1 $aIssues on trial
504 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
505 0 $a1. Declaring prior restraint unconstitutional. Case overview : Near v. Minnesota (1931): The Court's decision: prior restraint is unconstitutional / Charles Evans Hughes -- Dissenting opinion: freedom of the press has limits / Pierce Butler -- Near was a landmark decision for press freedom / Fred W. Friendly -- Near has led to media excesses / Patrick Buchanan -- Even objectionable individuals deserve press freedom / Tony Mauro -- 2. Protecting the press against charges of libel. Case overview : New York Times v. Sullivan (1964): The Court's decision: criticism of government is not libelous / William J. Brennan Jr. -- Sullivan was a victory for civil rights / Norman L. Rosenberg -- Free press and libel law in cyberspace / Lee Dembart -- The lesson of Sullivan has been forgotten / Gilbert S. Merritt -- 3. Balancing press freedom and national security. Case overview : New York Times Company v. United States (the Pentagon papers case) (1971): The Court's decision: the press must be free to criticize the government / Hugo L. Black -- Dissenting opinion: the government can suppress sensitive information / John Marshall Harlan II -- Press and public reaction to New York Times v. United States / Alexander Auerbach -- A reevaluation of New York Times v. United States / David Rudenstine -- The lessons of New York Times v. United Stated have faded / Anthony Lewis -- 4. Requiring reporters to divulge their sources. Case overview : Branzburg v. Hayes (1972): The Court's decision: reporters must divulge their sources to grand juries / Byron R. White -- Dissenting opinion: reporters should not be required to divulge their sources / William O. Douglas -- Shield laws are needed to protect the press / Herbert G. Klein -- Branzburg has been applied inconsistently / Elena Kagan and Frederick Schauer, interview by Robb London -- Branzburg should be overturned or modified / Julie Hilden -- Organizations to contact -- Further research -- Index.
520 $aContentious issues such as abortion and the death penalty touch on people's deeply held personal and political beliefs. But these issues have also been tested many times in the courts. Often these court decisions reflect societal climate and offer a fascinating way to trace changing trends. This anthology series captures the passion and depth of these debates and provides an ideal resource for research on social issues. Each volume focuses on a specific issue and examines how the courts have helped to shape that issue through their rulings. Primary sources include the text of court rulings and dissenting opinions as well as contemporaneous analysis and opinion on the rulings. Secondary sources provide retrospective evaluation of the courts' decisions and their legacies. Additional features add to the usefulness of these volumes, including an annotated table of contents, an in-depth introduction and chapter prefaces, a comprehensive index, book and periodical bibliographies, and a list of organizations to contact for additional information on the issue. This engaging series offers a wealth of information on both the historical and contemporary aspects of the most pressing issues confronting society.
650 0 $aFreedom of the press$zUnited States$vCases.
650 7 $aFreedom of the press.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst00934063
651 7 $aUnited States.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst01204155
650 7 $aPressefreiheit$2gnd
651 7 $aUSA.$2swd
655 7 $aTrials, litigation, etc.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst01423712
655 4 $aCases.
700 1 $aEdelman, Rob.
830 0 $aIssues on trial.
938 $aBaker & Taylor$bBKTY$c36.20$d36.20$i0737734493$n0006738910$sactive
938 $aBrodart$bBROD$n05205891$c$40.90
938 $aBaker and Taylor$bBTCP$n2006041173
938 $aIngram$bINGR$n0737734493
938 $aYBP Library Services$bYANK$n2436515
029 0 $aIG#$b0737734493
029 1 $aHEBIS$b183757203
029 1 $aYDXCP$b2436515
994 $aZ0$bP4A
948 $hNO HOLDINGS IN P4A - 240 OTHER HOLDINGS